Abstract
Let {Xn} be a strictly stationary φ-mixing process with Σj=1∞ φ 1 2(j) < ∞. It is shown in the paper that if X1 is uniformly distributed on the unit interval, then, for any t ∈ [0, 1], |Fn-1(t) - t + Fn(t) - t| = O(n- 3 4(log log n) 3 4) a.s. and sup0≤t≤1 |Fn-1(t) - t + Fn(t) - t| = (O(n- 3 4(log n) 1 2(log log n) 1 4) a.s., where Fn and Fn-1(t) denote the sample distribution function and tth sample quantile, respectively. In case {Xn} is strong mixing with exponentially decaying mixing coefficients, it is shown that, for any t ∈ [0, 1], |Fn-1(t) - t + Fn(t) - t| = O(n- 3 4(log n) 1 2(log log n) 3 4) a.s. and sup0≤t≤1 |Fn-1(t) - t + Fn(t) - t| = O(n- 3 4(log n)(log log n) 1 4) a.s. The results are further extended to general distributions, including some nonregular cases, when the underlying distribution function is not differentiable. The results for φ-mixing processes give the sharpest possible orders in view of the corresponding results of Kiefer for independent random variables.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 532-549 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Multivariate Analysis |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1978 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Statistics and Probability
- Numerical Analysis
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On deviations between empirical and quantile processes for mixing random variables'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver