TY - JOUR
T1 - On the role of hydrologic processes in soil and landscape evolution modeling
T2 - concepts, complications and partial solutions
AU - van der Meij, W. M.
AU - Temme, A. J.A.M.
AU - Lin, H. S.
AU - Gerke, H. H.
AU - Sommer, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Ype van der Velde, Jan Boll and Erin Brooks for their help in the search for possible hydrological models to use together with SLEMs. Marijn van der Meij and Arnaud Temme thank Fei Jiang for her help and hospitality during their visit to Pennsylvania State University. Furthermore, we would like to thank Gert Peek for his interpretation of the genesis of the Podzol profile in the Drents-Friese Wold National Park.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - The ability of water to transport and transform soil materials is one of the main drivers of soil and landscape development. In turn, soil and landscape properties determine how water is distributed in soil landscapes. Understanding the complex dynamics of this co-evolution of soils, landscapes and the hydrological system is fundamental in adapting land management to changes in climate. Soil-Landscape Evolution Models (SLEMs) are used to simulate the development and evolution of soils and landscapes. However, many hydrologic processes, such as preferential flow and subsurface lateral flow, are currently absent in these models. This limits the applicability of SLEMs to improve our understanding of feedbacks in the hydro-pedo-geomorphological system. Implementation of these hydrologic processes in SLEMs faces several complications related to calculation demands, limited methods for linking pedogenic and hydrologic processes, and limited data on quantification of changes in the hydrological system over time. In this contribution, we first briefly review processes and feedbacks in soil-landscape-hydrological systems. Next, we elaborate on the development required to include these processes in SLEMs. We discuss the state-of-the-art knowledge, identify complications, give partial solutions and suggest important future development. The main requirements for incorporating hydrologic processes in SLEMs are: (1) designing a model framework that can deal with varying timescales for different sets of processes, (2) developing and implementing methods for simulating pedogenesis as a function of water flow, (3) improving and implementing knowledge on the evolution and dynamics of soil hydraulic properties over different timescales, and (4) improving the database on temporal changes and dynamics of flow paths.
AB - The ability of water to transport and transform soil materials is one of the main drivers of soil and landscape development. In turn, soil and landscape properties determine how water is distributed in soil landscapes. Understanding the complex dynamics of this co-evolution of soils, landscapes and the hydrological system is fundamental in adapting land management to changes in climate. Soil-Landscape Evolution Models (SLEMs) are used to simulate the development and evolution of soils and landscapes. However, many hydrologic processes, such as preferential flow and subsurface lateral flow, are currently absent in these models. This limits the applicability of SLEMs to improve our understanding of feedbacks in the hydro-pedo-geomorphological system. Implementation of these hydrologic processes in SLEMs faces several complications related to calculation demands, limited methods for linking pedogenic and hydrologic processes, and limited data on quantification of changes in the hydrological system over time. In this contribution, we first briefly review processes and feedbacks in soil-landscape-hydrological systems. Next, we elaborate on the development required to include these processes in SLEMs. We discuss the state-of-the-art knowledge, identify complications, give partial solutions and suggest important future development. The main requirements for incorporating hydrologic processes in SLEMs are: (1) designing a model framework that can deal with varying timescales for different sets of processes, (2) developing and implementing methods for simulating pedogenesis as a function of water flow, (3) improving and implementing knowledge on the evolution and dynamics of soil hydraulic properties over different timescales, and (4) improving the database on temporal changes and dynamics of flow paths.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053798204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053798204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.09.001
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85053798204
SN - 0012-8252
VL - 185
SP - 1088
EP - 1106
JO - Earth-Science Reviews
JF - Earth-Science Reviews
ER -