TY - JOUR
T1 - Ontogeny and polarization of macrophages in inflammation
T2 - Blood monocytes versus tissue macrophages
AU - Dey, Adwitia
AU - Allen, Joselyn
AU - Hankey-Giblin, Pamela A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Dey, Allen and Hankey-Giblin.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The explosion of new information in recent years on the origin of macrophages in the steady-state and in the context of inflammation has opened up numerous new avenues of investigation and possibilities for therapeutic intervention. In contrast to the classical model of macrophage development, it is clear that tissue-resident macrophages can develop from yolk sac-derived erythro-myeloid progenitors, fetal liver progenitors, and bone marrow-derived monocytes. Under both homeostatic conditions and in response to pathophysiological insult, the contribution of these distinct sources of macrophages varies significantly between tissues. Furthermore, while all of these populations of macrophages appear to be capable of adopting the polarized M1/M2 phenotypes, their respective contribution to inflammation, resolution of inflammation, and tissue repair remains poorly understood and is likely to be tissue- and disease-dependent. A better understanding of the ontology and polarization capacity of macrophages in homeostasis and disease will be essential for the development of novel therapies that target the inherent plasticity of macrophages in the treatment of acute and chronic inflammatory disease.
AB - The explosion of new information in recent years on the origin of macrophages in the steady-state and in the context of inflammation has opened up numerous new avenues of investigation and possibilities for therapeutic intervention. In contrast to the classical model of macrophage development, it is clear that tissue-resident macrophages can develop from yolk sac-derived erythro-myeloid progenitors, fetal liver progenitors, and bone marrow-derived monocytes. Under both homeostatic conditions and in response to pathophysiological insult, the contribution of these distinct sources of macrophages varies significantly between tissues. Furthermore, while all of these populations of macrophages appear to be capable of adopting the polarized M1/M2 phenotypes, their respective contribution to inflammation, resolution of inflammation, and tissue repair remains poorly understood and is likely to be tissue- and disease-dependent. A better understanding of the ontology and polarization capacity of macrophages in homeostasis and disease will be essential for the development of novel therapies that target the inherent plasticity of macrophages in the treatment of acute and chronic inflammatory disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926656185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926656185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00683
DO - 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00683
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25657646
AN - SCOPUS:84926656185
SN - 1664-3224
VL - 6
JO - Frontiers in immunology
JF - Frontiers in immunology
IS - JAN
M1 - 00683
ER -