Abstract
Introduction/Aims: Platform trials present several advantages over traditional interventional clinical trials. Here, we provide a detailed description of the operational framework of the HEALEY ALS Platform Trial. Methods: Platform-level procedures for regulatory oversight, safety, and site management were developed prior to trial launch. Central vendors and a single Institutional Review Board (sIRB) were used. An Investigational New Drug (IND) application was submitted for the master protocol, and each regimen was added as an amendment. Results: The HEALEY ALS Platform Trial was launched in 2020. Fifty-four geographically diverse sites from the Northeast ALS Consortium (NEALS), all highly experienced in ALS care and research, were selected. Three investigational products were selected to launch concurrently at the start of the trial as individual regimens. A fourth investigational product was selected and added to the trial after the initial launch. The Master Protocol and the first three regimens (Regimens A-C) were sIRB approved in 120 days. sIRB amendment for Regimen D was approved in 21 days. Enrollment for regimens A–C was completed in 15 months, whereas Regimen D was completed in 11 months from the start of enrollment. Results of all regimens were available within approximately 2 years from the initial trial launch. Discussion: The HEALEY ALS Platform Trial capitalized on the benefits of the platform approach, including an adaptable operational infrastructure, concurrent enrollment into four distinct regimens, and an accelerated start-up time for a new regimen added after initial trial launch.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 294-305 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Muscle and Nerve |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2025 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Physiology
- Clinical Neurology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Physiology (medical)