Abstract
Peripheral blood (PB), compared with bone marrow graft, has higher stem cell content, leads to faster engraftment and is more convenient for collection. Consequently, the use of PB graft has significantly increased in recent years. Although the use of PB graft is acceptable or even preferred to bone marrow graft in matched related donor allogeneic transplant due to a possibility of improved survival, PB graft increases the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease and associated long-term toxicities in the setting of matched unrelated donor allogeneic transplant. In haploidentical transplant, mitigation of graft-versus-host disease with the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide is a hypothesis-generating possibility; however, available studies have significant limitations to draw any definite conclusion.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1823-1832 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Future Oncology |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 15 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Oncology
- Cancer Research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal graft source for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant: Bone marrow or peripheral blood?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver