TY - JOUR
T1 - Organizational processes and nuclear power plant safety
AU - Jacobs, Rick
AU - Haber, Sonja
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was sponsored by research contracts from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to Pennsylvania State University's Center for Applied Behavioral Sciences (Rick Jacobs, Principal Investigator) and Brookhaven National Laboratory's Human Factors and Performance Analysis Group (Sonja Haber, Principal Investigator). The authors are grateful for the support of this work by NRC and the technical project monitor, Joel Kramer. The authors also acknowledge Professors George Apostolakis, David Okrent and Ike Grusky of UCLA, Dr Doug Orvis of Accident Prevention Group, Joel Kramer, Carl Johnson and Frank Coffman for their assistance in transforming ideas into action. Although this paper is based on research funded in part by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, it presents the opinions of the authors, and does not necessarily reflect the regulatory requirements or policies of the USNRC.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - This paper describes an integrated effort to define and measure organizational factors related to nuclear power plant safety. The research began by reviewing previously conducted studies looking at nuclear power operations and operations in other high reliability industries for indications of common safety-related, performance dimensions. Having established a list of 20 common dimensions, the project went on to fully define these dimensions and develop methods for their assessment. The methods of assessment developed for this application were employee survey-a series of self report questions answered by employees, behavioral checklist-sets of statements about the plant and its operations that observers respond to by answering yes or no, structured interview-a set of questions and interviewer asks of an employee and built around the 20 dimensions identified, and behaviorally anchored rating scales-an extension of the methodology used for assessing the performance of individuals to the process of assessing a nuclear power plant. Each of the methodologies is described as it applies to the assessment within the nuclear power environment and examples of each method are presented. Pilot tests of the feasibility of using these assessment methods were conducted in two nuclear power plants and the results are encouraging both in terms of the immediate identification of potential safety issues and as valuable additions to probabilistic risk assessment. Implications of this work for the future assessment of organizational factors related to nuclear power safety are discussed.
AB - This paper describes an integrated effort to define and measure organizational factors related to nuclear power plant safety. The research began by reviewing previously conducted studies looking at nuclear power operations and operations in other high reliability industries for indications of common safety-related, performance dimensions. Having established a list of 20 common dimensions, the project went on to fully define these dimensions and develop methods for their assessment. The methods of assessment developed for this application were employee survey-a series of self report questions answered by employees, behavioral checklist-sets of statements about the plant and its operations that observers respond to by answering yes or no, structured interview-a set of questions and interviewer asks of an employee and built around the 20 dimensions identified, and behaviorally anchored rating scales-an extension of the methodology used for assessing the performance of individuals to the process of assessing a nuclear power plant. Each of the methodologies is described as it applies to the assessment within the nuclear power environment and examples of each method are presented. Pilot tests of the feasibility of using these assessment methods were conducted in two nuclear power plants and the results are encouraging both in terms of the immediate identification of potential safety issues and as valuable additions to probabilistic risk assessment. Implications of this work for the future assessment of organizational factors related to nuclear power safety are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028574536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028574536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0951-8320(94)90078-7
DO - 10.1016/0951-8320(94)90078-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0028574536
SN - 0951-8320
VL - 45
SP - 75
EP - 83
JO - Reliability Engineering and System Safety
JF - Reliability Engineering and System Safety
IS - 1-2
ER -