TY - JOUR
T1 - Osteonecrosis of the femoral head
T2 - the total hip replacement solution
AU - Issa, K.
AU - Pivec, R.
AU - Kapadia, B. H.
AU - Banerjee, S.
AU - Mont, M. A.
PY - 2013/11/1
Y1 - 2013/11/1
N2 - Symptomatic hip osteonecrosis is a disabling condition with a poorly understood aetiology and pathogenesis. Numerous treatment options for hip osteonecrosis are described, which include non-operative management and joint preserving procedures, as well as total hip replacement (THR). Non-operative or joint preserving treatment may improve outcomes when an early diagnosis is made before the lesion has become too large or there is radiographic evidence of femoral head collapse. The presence of a crescent sign, femoral head flattening, and acetabular involvement indicate a more advanced-stage disease in which joint preserving options are less effective than THR. Since many patients present after disease progression, primary THR is often the only reliable treatment option available. Prior to the 1990 s, outcomes of THR for osteonecrosis were poor. However, according to recent reports and systemic reviews, it is encouraging that with the introduction of newer ceramic and/or highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings as well as highly-porous fixation interfaces, THR appears to be a reliable option in the management of end-stage arthritis following hip osteonecrosis in this historically difficult to treat patient population.
AB - Symptomatic hip osteonecrosis is a disabling condition with a poorly understood aetiology and pathogenesis. Numerous treatment options for hip osteonecrosis are described, which include non-operative management and joint preserving procedures, as well as total hip replacement (THR). Non-operative or joint preserving treatment may improve outcomes when an early diagnosis is made before the lesion has become too large or there is radiographic evidence of femoral head collapse. The presence of a crescent sign, femoral head flattening, and acetabular involvement indicate a more advanced-stage disease in which joint preserving options are less effective than THR. Since many patients present after disease progression, primary THR is often the only reliable treatment option available. Prior to the 1990 s, outcomes of THR for osteonecrosis were poor. However, according to recent reports and systemic reviews, it is encouraging that with the introduction of newer ceramic and/or highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings as well as highly-porous fixation interfaces, THR appears to be a reliable option in the management of end-stage arthritis following hip osteonecrosis in this historically difficult to treat patient population.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84892519251
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892519251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32644
DO - 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32644
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24187351
AN - SCOPUS:84892519251
SN - 2049-4394
VL - 95-B
SP - 46
EP - 50
JO - The bone & joint journal
JF - The bone & joint journal
IS - 11
ER -