Outcomes of endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


While radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold-standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a growing volume of literature surrounding endoscopic, organ-sparing procedures has developed over the past few decades. Based on this, endoscopic management of UTUC has gained acceptance as a standard of care approach, particularly among those with low-risk disease or with imperative indications for organ preservation. As a rare disease, however, data is mostly restricted to retrospective single institution series with relatively small numbers. Therefore, comparative outcomes of endoscopic management to RNU remain incompletely defined. Furthermore, the comparative utility of endoscopic approaches (ureteroscopy versus percutaneous resection) and topical therapy following resection lacks prospective analysis. In this article we review the available literature on endoscopic management of UTUC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1821-1830
Number of pages10
JournalTranslational Andrology and Urology
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this