TY - JOUR
T1 - Over-Exposed Self-Correction
T2 - Practices for Managing Competence and Morality
AU - Bolden, Galina B.
AU - Hepburn, Alexa
AU - Potter, Jonathan
AU - Zhan, Kaicheng
AU - Wei, Wan
AU - Park, Song Hee
AU - Shirokov, Aleksandr
AU - Chun, Hee Chung
AU - Kurlenkova, Aleksandra
AU - Licciardello, Dana
AU - Caldwell, Marissa
AU - Mandelbaum, Jenny
AU - Mikesell, Lisa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - When repairing a problem in their talk, speakers sometimes do more than simply correct an error, extending the self-correction segment to comment on, repeat, apologize, and/or reject the error. We call this “over-exposed self-correction.” In over-exposing the error, speakers may manage (and reflexively construct) a range of attributional troubles that it has raised. We discuss how over-exposed self-correction can be used to: (a) remediate errors that might suggest the speaker’s incompetence; and (b) redress errors that may be heard as revealing relational “evils” (implicating inadequate other-attentiveness) or societal “evils” (conveying problematic social attitudes and prejudices). The article thus shows how conversation analytic work on repair can provide a platform for studying the emergence and management of socially and relationally charged issues in interaction. The data come from a diverse corpus of talk-in-interaction in American, British, and Australian English.
AB - When repairing a problem in their talk, speakers sometimes do more than simply correct an error, extending the self-correction segment to comment on, repeat, apologize, and/or reject the error. We call this “over-exposed self-correction.” In over-exposing the error, speakers may manage (and reflexively construct) a range of attributional troubles that it has raised. We discuss how over-exposed self-correction can be used to: (a) remediate errors that might suggest the speaker’s incompetence; and (b) redress errors that may be heard as revealing relational “evils” (implicating inadequate other-attentiveness) or societal “evils” (conveying problematic social attitudes and prejudices). The article thus shows how conversation analytic work on repair can provide a platform for studying the emergence and management of socially and relationally charged issues in interaction. The data come from a diverse corpus of talk-in-interaction in American, British, and Australian English.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134384628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134384628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08351813.2022.2067426
DO - 10.1080/08351813.2022.2067426
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85134384628
SN - 0835-1813
VL - 55
SP - 203
EP - 221
JO - Research on Language and Social Interaction
JF - Research on Language and Social Interaction
IS - 3
ER -