TY - JOUR
T1 - Overcoming barriers to diabetes care in the hospital
T2 - The power of qualitative observations to promote positive change
AU - Pichardo-Lowden, Ariana
AU - Farbaniec, Michelle
AU - Haidet, Paul
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank their colleagues at the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center for participating in the conduct of this study. We also thank the following contributors: Lisa Doster in the support and Metabolism for her contributions on data coding and manuscript proof reading; Dr Daniel George, PhD in the Department of Humanities for the review and feedback on the field site guide; and Dr. Chris Fan, MD for serving as a critical peer reviewer of the qualitative findings. Ariana Pichardo-Lowden is the guarantor of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Aims: Despite advocacy by diabetes societies and evidence about how to prevent the deleterious consequences of dysglycemia among hospitalized patients, deficits in clinical practice continue to present barriers to care. The purpose of this study was to examine inpatient rounding practices using a qualitative research lens to assess challenges on the care of hospitalized patients with diabetes and to develop ideas for positive changes in hospital management of diabetes and hyperglycemia. Methods: We conducted an interpretive analysis of qualitative observations during medical and surgical inpatient rounds at an academic institution. We coded, analysed, and reported data as thematic findings. Results: Emerging themes include omissions in discussions during rounds; unpreparedness to address diabetes or dysglycemia during rounds; identifying practice improvement opportunities to address diabetes issues: and recognizing accountability within the routine of practice. Conclusions: This work guides clinicians and informs systems of practice about improvement strategies that can emerge from within hospital teams. These recommendations emphasize the interconnectedness of practice elements including thoughtful review of glucose status during rounds among patients with and without diabetes; fostering doctors and nurses to work in unison; promoting awareness and integration within and across disciplines; and advocating for better use of existing resources.
AB - Aims: Despite advocacy by diabetes societies and evidence about how to prevent the deleterious consequences of dysglycemia among hospitalized patients, deficits in clinical practice continue to present barriers to care. The purpose of this study was to examine inpatient rounding practices using a qualitative research lens to assess challenges on the care of hospitalized patients with diabetes and to develop ideas for positive changes in hospital management of diabetes and hyperglycemia. Methods: We conducted an interpretive analysis of qualitative observations during medical and surgical inpatient rounds at an academic institution. We coded, analysed, and reported data as thematic findings. Results: Emerging themes include omissions in discussions during rounds; unpreparedness to address diabetes or dysglycemia during rounds; identifying practice improvement opportunities to address diabetes issues: and recognizing accountability within the routine of practice. Conclusions: This work guides clinicians and informs systems of practice about improvement strategies that can emerge from within hospital teams. These recommendations emphasize the interconnectedness of practice elements including thoughtful review of glucose status during rounds among patients with and without diabetes; fostering doctors and nurses to work in unison; promoting awareness and integration within and across disciplines; and advocating for better use of existing resources.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055880498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055880498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jep.13057
DO - 10.1111/jep.13057
M3 - Article
C2 - 30378222
AN - SCOPUS:85055880498
SN - 1356-1294
VL - 25
SP - 448
EP - 455
JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
IS - 3
ER -