Papers of note: Testing the fidelity of climate reconstruction methods

Michael E. Mann; S. Rutherford; E. Wahl; C. Ammann

Papers of note: Testing the fidelity of climate reconstruction methods

Michael E. Mann
, S. Rutherford
, E. Wahl
, C. Ammann

Meteorology and Atmospheric Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The Climate Field Reconstruction (CFR) method and the "compsite-plus-scale" (CPS) method were tested using a simulation of the climate of the past millenium (AD 850-1999) employing the NCAR Climate System Model 1.4 coupled ocean-atmosphere model driven by estimated long-term natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing histories. It was found that both methods are likely to provide a faithful estimate of actual long-term hemispheric temperature histories, within estimated uncertainties.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	166-167
Number of pages	2
Journal	Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Volume	87
Issue number	2
State	Published - Feb 2006

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 13 Climate Action

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Atmospheric Science

Cite this

@article{52bc70b08c314dd8a8ed6e4cd534b551,

title = "Papers of note: Testing the fidelity of climate reconstruction methods",

abstract = "The Climate Field Reconstruction (CFR) method and the {"}compsite-plus-scale{"} (CPS) method were tested using a simulation of the climate of the past millenium (AD 850-1999) employing the NCAR Climate System Model 1.4 coupled ocean-atmosphere model driven by estimated long-term natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing histories. It was found that both methods are likely to provide a faithful estimate of actual long-term hemispheric temperature histories, within estimated uncertainties.",

author = "Mann, \{Michael E.\} and S. Rutherford and E. Wahl and C. Ammann",

year = "2006",

month = feb,

language = "English (US)",

volume = "87",

pages = "166--167",

journal = "Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society",

issn = "0003-0007",

publisher = "American Meteorological Society",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Papers of note

T2 - Testing the fidelity of climate reconstruction methods

AU - Mann, Michael E.

AU - Rutherford, S.

AU - Wahl, E.

AU - Ammann, C.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - The Climate Field Reconstruction (CFR) method and the "compsite-plus-scale" (CPS) method were tested using a simulation of the climate of the past millenium (AD 850-1999) employing the NCAR Climate System Model 1.4 coupled ocean-atmosphere model driven by estimated long-term natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing histories. It was found that both methods are likely to provide a faithful estimate of actual long-term hemispheric temperature histories, within estimated uncertainties.

AB - The Climate Field Reconstruction (CFR) method and the "compsite-plus-scale" (CPS) method were tested using a simulation of the climate of the past millenium (AD 850-1999) employing the NCAR Climate System Model 1.4 coupled ocean-atmosphere model driven by estimated long-term natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing histories. It was found that both methods are likely to provide a faithful estimate of actual long-term hemispheric temperature histories, within estimated uncertainties.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33645024505

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33645024505#tab=citedBy

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33645024505

SN - 0003-0007

VL - 87

SP - 166

EP - 167

JO - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

JF - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

IS - 2

ER -

Papers of note: Testing the fidelity of climate reconstruction methods

Abstract

UN SDGs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this