TY - JOUR
T1 - Paradigms and commonalities in atmospheric source term estimation methods
AU - Bieringer, Paul E.
AU - Young, George S.
AU - Rodriguez, Luna M.
AU - Annunzio, Andrew J.
AU - Vandenberghe, Francois
AU - Haupt, Sue Ellen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Modeling the downwind hazard area resulting from the unknown release of an atmospheric contaminant requires estimation of the source characteristics of a localized source from concentration or dosage observations and use of this information to model the subsequent transport and dispersion of the contaminant. This source term estimation problem is mathematically challenging because airborne material concentration observations and wind data are typically sparse and the turbulent wind field chaotic. Methods for addressing this problem fall into three general categories: forward modeling, inverse modeling, and nonlinear optimization. Because numerous methods have been developed on various foundations, they often have a disparate nomenclature. This situation poses challenges to those facing a new source term estimation problem, particularly when selecting the best method for the problem at hand. There is, however, much commonality between many of these methods, especially within each category. Here we seek to address the difficulties encountered when selecting an STE method by providing a synthesis of the various methods that highlights commonalities, potential opportunities for component exchange, and lessons learned that can be applied across methods.
AB - Modeling the downwind hazard area resulting from the unknown release of an atmospheric contaminant requires estimation of the source characteristics of a localized source from concentration or dosage observations and use of this information to model the subsequent transport and dispersion of the contaminant. This source term estimation problem is mathematically challenging because airborne material concentration observations and wind data are typically sparse and the turbulent wind field chaotic. Methods for addressing this problem fall into three general categories: forward modeling, inverse modeling, and nonlinear optimization. Because numerous methods have been developed on various foundations, they often have a disparate nomenclature. This situation poses challenges to those facing a new source term estimation problem, particularly when selecting the best method for the problem at hand. There is, however, much commonality between many of these methods, especially within each category. Here we seek to address the difficulties encountered when selecting an STE method by providing a synthesis of the various methods that highlights commonalities, potential opportunities for component exchange, and lessons learned that can be applied across methods.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014327772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014327772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.011
DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.011
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85014327772
SN - 1352-2310
VL - 156
SP - 102
EP - 112
JO - Atmospheric Environment
JF - Atmospheric Environment
ER -