TY - JOUR
T1 - Parameterization for distributed watershed modeling using national data and evolutionary algorithm
AU - Yu, Xuan
AU - Bhatt, Gopal
AU - Duffy, Christopher
AU - Shi, Yuning
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to the Editor Prof. Balazs Fekete and two anonymous referees for useful insights which improved a previous version of this manuscript. This research was funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, EAR 0725019 Shale Hills-Susquehanna Critical Zone Observatory, and from the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA R833013 Hydrologic Forecasting for Characterization of Non-linear Response of Freshwater Wetlands to Climatic and Land Use Change in the Susquehanna River Basin.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Distributed hydrologic models supported by national soil survey, geology, topography and vegetation data products can provide valuable information about the watershed hydrologic cycle. However numerical simulation of the multi-state, multi-process system is structurally complex and computationally intensive. This presents a major difficulty in model calibration using traditional techniques. This paper presents an efficient calibration strategy for the physics-based, fully coupled, distributed hydrologic model Penn State Integrated Hydrologic Model (PIHM) with the support of national data products. PIHM uses a semi-discrete Finite Volume Method (FVM) formulation of the system of coupled ordinary differential equations (e.g. canopy interception, transpiration, soil evaporation) and partial differential equations (e.g. groundwater-surface water, overland flow, infiltration, channel flow, etc.). The matrix of key parameters to be estimated in the optimization process was partitioned into two groups according to the sensitivity to difference in time scales. The first group of parameters generally describes hydrologic processes influenced by hydrologic events (event-scale group: EG), which are sensitive to short time runoff generation, while the second group of parameters is largely influenced by seasonal changes in energy (seasonal time scale group: SG). The Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) is used to optimize the EG parameters in Message Passing Interface (MPI) environment, followed by the estimation of parameters in the SG. The calibration strategy was applied at three watersheds in central PA: a small upland catchment (8.4ha), a watershed in the Appalachian Plateau (231km2) and the Valley and Ridge of central Pennsylvania (843km2). A partition calibration enabled a fast and efficient estimation of parameters.
AB - Distributed hydrologic models supported by national soil survey, geology, topography and vegetation data products can provide valuable information about the watershed hydrologic cycle. However numerical simulation of the multi-state, multi-process system is structurally complex and computationally intensive. This presents a major difficulty in model calibration using traditional techniques. This paper presents an efficient calibration strategy for the physics-based, fully coupled, distributed hydrologic model Penn State Integrated Hydrologic Model (PIHM) with the support of national data products. PIHM uses a semi-discrete Finite Volume Method (FVM) formulation of the system of coupled ordinary differential equations (e.g. canopy interception, transpiration, soil evaporation) and partial differential equations (e.g. groundwater-surface water, overland flow, infiltration, channel flow, etc.). The matrix of key parameters to be estimated in the optimization process was partitioned into two groups according to the sensitivity to difference in time scales. The first group of parameters generally describes hydrologic processes influenced by hydrologic events (event-scale group: EG), which are sensitive to short time runoff generation, while the second group of parameters is largely influenced by seasonal changes in energy (seasonal time scale group: SG). The Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) is used to optimize the EG parameters in Message Passing Interface (MPI) environment, followed by the estimation of parameters in the SG. The calibration strategy was applied at three watersheds in central PA: a small upland catchment (8.4ha), a watershed in the Appalachian Plateau (231km2) and the Valley and Ridge of central Pennsylvania (843km2). A partition calibration enabled a fast and efficient estimation of parameters.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879453588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879453588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cageo.2013.04.025
DO - 10.1016/j.cageo.2013.04.025
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84879453588
SN - 0098-3004
VL - 58
SP - 80
EP - 90
JO - Computers and Geosciences
JF - Computers and Geosciences
ER -