TY - JOUR
T1 - Parasite-mediated competition between pheasant and grey partridge
T2 - A preliminary investigation
AU - Tompkins, D. M.
AU - Dickson, G.
AU - Hudson, P. J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We wish to thank Pauline Monteith, Fergus MacGregor, Florence Troup and The Game Conservancy Trust for their assistance. The comments of Pete Robertson and two anonymous referees greatly improved the manuscript. This work was funded by NERC project grant GR3/10647.
Copyright:
Copyright 2004 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam. All rights reserved.
PY - 1999/5
Y1 - 1999/5
N2 - Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) and grey partridges (Perdix perdix) were maintained together on land known to be contaminated with eggs of the caecal nematode Heterakis gallinarum to examine the hypothesis that this shared parasite has a greater impact on grey partridges than on pheasants. Since an inverse relationship between worm intensity and partridge body condition was detected, while no such relationship with pheasant body condition was observed, we were unable to refute this hypothesis. Furthermore, that there was no relationship between worm intensity after the exposure period and partridge body mass prior to the infection trial implies that infection caused the decrease in partridge body condition, and not vice versa. Data consistent with previous observations that H. gallinarum fecundity and survival is greater in pheasants than in partridges suggest that the bulk source of nematode infection to wild grey partridges is reared pheasants, and not the partridges themselves. This, and the differential impact on host body condition, supports the hypothesis that the spread of parasites from increasing numbers of released pheasants has contributed to the decline in wild grey partridge populations in the UK within the past 50 years.
AB - Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) and grey partridges (Perdix perdix) were maintained together on land known to be contaminated with eggs of the caecal nematode Heterakis gallinarum to examine the hypothesis that this shared parasite has a greater impact on grey partridges than on pheasants. Since an inverse relationship between worm intensity and partridge body condition was detected, while no such relationship with pheasant body condition was observed, we were unable to refute this hypothesis. Furthermore, that there was no relationship between worm intensity after the exposure period and partridge body mass prior to the infection trial implies that infection caused the decrease in partridge body condition, and not vice versa. Data consistent with previous observations that H. gallinarum fecundity and survival is greater in pheasants than in partridges suggest that the bulk source of nematode infection to wild grey partridges is reared pheasants, and not the partridges themselves. This, and the differential impact on host body condition, supports the hypothesis that the spread of parasites from increasing numbers of released pheasants has contributed to the decline in wild grey partridge populations in the UK within the past 50 years.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033028939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033028939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s004420050798
DO - 10.1007/s004420050798
M3 - Article
C2 - 28307760
AN - SCOPUS:0033028939
SN - 0029-8549
VL - 119
SP - 378
EP - 382
JO - Oecologia
JF - Oecologia
IS - 3
ER -