TY - GEN
T1 - Partial sensing coverage and deployment efficiency in wireless directional sensor networks
AU - Wang, Yun
AU - Xiao, Zhifeng
AU - Wu, Yanwei
AU - Stephan, Anthony G.
AU - Siegers, Jacob M.
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Unlike most existing works that focus on a conventional omni-directional sensor network, we investigate the sensing coverage problem in a directional sensor network through mathematically modeling, analysis, and computer-based simulation evaluation. Research results show: 1) A factor of (2π/θ) more sensors will be required to provide the same sensing coverage in a θ(θ < 2π)-directional sensor network with respect to its counterpart omni-directional sensor network; 2) Employing application-tolerable partial sensing coverage is of significant importance for directional sensor network implementation in practice, as a noticeable fraction of sensors can be saved; For example, 50% and 66.67% sensors can be saved for 90% sensing coverage as compared to 99% and 99.9% sensing coverage respectively under the same network settings; 3) The node saving rate of employing partial sensing coverage α(α < 1) with respect to full sensing coverage f(f ≈1), derived as ηα = ln(1-α)-ln(1-f)/ln(1-f), is solely determined by the sensing coverage requirement in an application and is independent of sensor features. Simulation results validate the modeling, derivation, and analysis.
AB - Unlike most existing works that focus on a conventional omni-directional sensor network, we investigate the sensing coverage problem in a directional sensor network through mathematically modeling, analysis, and computer-based simulation evaluation. Research results show: 1) A factor of (2π/θ) more sensors will be required to provide the same sensing coverage in a θ(θ < 2π)-directional sensor network with respect to its counterpart omni-directional sensor network; 2) Employing application-tolerable partial sensing coverage is of significant importance for directional sensor network implementation in practice, as a noticeable fraction of sensors can be saved; For example, 50% and 66.67% sensors can be saved for 90% sensing coverage as compared to 99% and 99.9% sensing coverage respectively under the same network settings; 3) The node saving rate of employing partial sensing coverage α(α < 1) with respect to full sensing coverage f(f ≈1), derived as ηα = ln(1-α)-ln(1-f)/ln(1-f), is solely determined by the sensing coverage requirement in an application and is independent of sensor features. Simulation results validate the modeling, derivation, and analysis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903977389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903977389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/WTS.2014.6835029
DO - 10.1109/WTS.2014.6835029
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84903977389
SN - 9781479912971
T3 - Wireless Telecommunications Symposium
BT - 2014 Wireless Telecommunications Symposium, WTS 2014
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 13th Annual Wireless Telecommunications Symposium, WTS 2014
Y2 - 9 April 2014 through 11 April 2014
ER -