TY - JOUR
T1 - Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and maternal depressive symptoms
T2 - Moderation by program perception
AU - Bergmans, Rachel S.
AU - Berger, Lawrence M.
AU - Palta, Mari
AU - Robert, Stephanie A.
AU - Ehrenthal, Deborah B.
AU - Malecki, Kristen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Rationale Previous studies have observed an association between participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and depression, which is contrary to SNAP's potential to alleviate food insecurity and financial strain. Objective This study investigated the impact of change in SNAP participation status on maternal depression, and whether perceptions of government assistance moderate this association. Methods Data were from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS). Logistic regression models with individual-specific fixed-effects, were fit to SNAP-eligible mothers who changed SNAP participation and depression status (N = 256) during waves 2 to 4. Perceptions of government assistance were defined as feelings of humiliation or loss of freedom and tested for interactions with SNAP participation. Results Perceptions of government assistance moderated the association between SNAP participation and depression (p-interaction = 0.0208). Those with positive perceptions of welfare had 0.27 (95% CI = 0.08 to 0.89) times lower odds of depression when enrolled vs. not enrolled in SNAP. Among those with negative perceptions of welfare, SNAP enrollment was not associated with depression (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.51). Conclusion Evidence suggests that SNAP mental health benefits may be context specific. SNAP's capacity to improve mental health may depend on individual perceptions of government assistance. More research is needed to determine whether interventions aimed at mitigating negative perceptions of programs like SNAP could ameliorate poor mental health among program participants.
AB - Rationale Previous studies have observed an association between participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and depression, which is contrary to SNAP's potential to alleviate food insecurity and financial strain. Objective This study investigated the impact of change in SNAP participation status on maternal depression, and whether perceptions of government assistance moderate this association. Methods Data were from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS). Logistic regression models with individual-specific fixed-effects, were fit to SNAP-eligible mothers who changed SNAP participation and depression status (N = 256) during waves 2 to 4. Perceptions of government assistance were defined as feelings of humiliation or loss of freedom and tested for interactions with SNAP participation. Results Perceptions of government assistance moderated the association between SNAP participation and depression (p-interaction = 0.0208). Those with positive perceptions of welfare had 0.27 (95% CI = 0.08 to 0.89) times lower odds of depression when enrolled vs. not enrolled in SNAP. Among those with negative perceptions of welfare, SNAP enrollment was not associated with depression (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.51). Conclusion Evidence suggests that SNAP mental health benefits may be context specific. SNAP's capacity to improve mental health may depend on individual perceptions of government assistance. More research is needed to determine whether interventions aimed at mitigating negative perceptions of programs like SNAP could ameliorate poor mental health among program participants.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036515150&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036515150&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.039
DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.039
M3 - Article
C2 - 29197704
AN - SCOPUS:85036515150
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 197
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Social Science and Medicine
JF - Social Science and Medicine
ER -