Participatory analysis: Shared development of requirements from scenarios

George Chin; Mary Beth Rosson; John Carroll

Participatory analysis: Shared development of requirements from scenarios

George Chin
, Mary Beth Rosson
, John Carroll

College of Information Sciences and Technology

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Participatory design typically focuses on envisionment and evaluation activities. We explored a method for pushing the participatory activities further `upstream' in the design process, to the initial analysis of requirements. We used a variant of the task-artifact framework, carrying out a participatory claims analysis during a design workshop for a project addressing collaborative science education. The analysis used videotaped classroom sessions as source material. The participant-teachers were highly engaged by the analysis process and contributed significantly to the analysis results. We conclude that the method has promise as a technique for evoking self-reflection and analysis in a participatory design setting.

Original language	English (US)
Pages	162-169
Number of pages	8
State	Published - Jan 1 1997
Event	Proceedings of the 1997 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI - Atlanta, GA, USA Duration: Mar 22 1997 → Mar 27 1997

Other

Other	Proceedings of the 1997 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI
City	Atlanta, GA, USA
Period	3/22/97 → 3/27/97

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Software
Human-Computer Interaction
Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cite this

@conference{802b8b485d7b4d50a2934a86de2f553d,

title = "Participatory analysis: Shared development of requirements from scenarios",

abstract = "Participatory design typically focuses on envisionment and evaluation activities. We explored a method for pushing the participatory activities further `upstream' in the design process, to the initial analysis of requirements. We used a variant of the task-artifact framework, carrying out a participatory claims analysis during a design workshop for a project addressing collaborative science education. The analysis used videotaped classroom sessions as source material. The participant-teachers were highly engaged by the analysis process and contributed significantly to the analysis results. We conclude that the method has promise as a technique for evoking self-reflection and analysis in a participatory design setting.",

author = "George Chin and Rosson, \{Mary Beth\} and John Carroll",

year = "1997",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

pages = "162--169",

note = "Proceedings of the 1997 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ; Conference date: 22-03-1997 Through 27-03-1997",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Participatory analysis

T2 - Proceedings of the 1997 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI

AU - Chin, George

AU - Rosson, Mary Beth

AU - Carroll, John

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Participatory design typically focuses on envisionment and evaluation activities. We explored a method for pushing the participatory activities further `upstream' in the design process, to the initial analysis of requirements. We used a variant of the task-artifact framework, carrying out a participatory claims analysis during a design workshop for a project addressing collaborative science education. The analysis used videotaped classroom sessions as source material. The participant-teachers were highly engaged by the analysis process and contributed significantly to the analysis results. We conclude that the method has promise as a technique for evoking self-reflection and analysis in a participatory design setting.

AB - Participatory design typically focuses on envisionment and evaluation activities. We explored a method for pushing the participatory activities further `upstream' in the design process, to the initial analysis of requirements. We used a variant of the task-artifact framework, carrying out a participatory claims analysis during a design workshop for a project addressing collaborative science education. The analysis used videotaped classroom sessions as source material. The participant-teachers were highly engaged by the analysis process and contributed significantly to the analysis results. We conclude that the method has promise as a technique for evoking self-reflection and analysis in a participatory design setting.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0030677587

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0030677587#tab=citedBy

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:0030677587

SP - 162

EP - 169

Y2 - 22 March 1997 through 27 March 1997

ER -

Participatory analysis: Shared development of requirements from scenarios

Abstract

Other

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this