@article{a890f5b49b6a4a03a30cf481820d6201,
title = "Partitioning of caffeine and quinine in oil-in-water emulsions and effects on bitterness",
abstract = "The bulk vegetable oil–water partition coefficient of caffeine and quinine was determined by a shake-flask method as log Kow = −1.32 and 2.97. These values were consistent with the effect of oil concentration on the distribution of the bitterants in an oil-in-water emulsion (0–2 and 0–20 wt% oil stabilized with 0.125 and 1 wt% whey protein isolate, respectively). For example, in a 20% o/w emulsion, approximately 90% of the total caffeine remained in the aqueous phase, whereas in a 2% o/w emulsion, only ∼20% of the quinine remained in the aqueous phase. The intensity of the bitter taste of caffeine and quinine in emulsions was assessed by a large cohort (n = 100) of untrained participants. An increase in fat in the emulsions (from 0.5 wt% to 2 wt% oil emulsions stabilized with 0.125 wt% whey protein isolate) caused a significant decrease in perceived bitterness that was accompanied by a decrease in the aqueous concentration of the hydrophobic bitterant quinine Specifically, the bitterness of quinine was reduced ∼13% in the o/w emulsion with more fat, and this drop paralleled a drop in the aqueous concentration and was generally consistent with aqueous dose–response functions published elsewhere. For the hydrophilic bitterant caffeine, there was no significant change in the perceived bitterness or aqueous concentration with changing oil concentration. We conclude that the perceived bitterness of a hydrophobic bitterant like quinine in an emulsion depends on the aqueous concentration rather than the overall concentration.",
author = "Kelsey Tenney and Hayes, {John E.} and Bakke, {Alyssa J.} and Elias, {Ryan J.} and Coupland, {John N.}",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by funds from the Pennsylvania State University and federal appropriations administered by the USDA (Hatch Project #PEN04708 and Accession # 1019852). The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or US Government determination or policy. The authors thank Davisco Inc. for donating the whey protein isolate (BiPro) used here. We also wish to thank Dr. Cordelia Running for discussion of the design and interpretation of the sensory results, Dr. Federico Harte for assistance with the viscosity measurements, the Penn State Sensory Evaluation Center students and staff for their assistance with data collection, and our participants for their time. Funding Information: This work was supported by funds from the Pennsylvania State University and federal appropriations administered by the USDA (Hatch Project #PEN04708 and Accession # 1019852). The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or US Government determination or policy. The authors thank Davisco Inc. for donating the whey protein isolate (BiPro) used here. We also wish to thank Dr. Cordelia Running for discussion of the design and interpretation of the sensory results, Dr. Federico Harte for assistance with the viscosity measurements, the Penn State Sensory Evaluation Center students and staff for their assistance with data collection, and our participants for their time. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Institute of Food Technologists.",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1111/1750-3841.16378",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "122--129",
journal = "Journal of Food Science",
issn = "0022-1147",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
}