TY - JOUR
T1 - Partner-specific prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins
T2 - A critical assessment
AU - Jung, Yong
AU - EL-Manzalawy, Yasser
AU - Dobbs, Drena
AU - Honavar, Vasant G.
N1 - Funding Information:
Indian Institute of Science; Pennsylvania State University; Pennsylvania State University; Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences; National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Number: NCATS UL1 TR002014-01; National Science Foundation, Grant/Award Number: ACI 1640834
Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation (ACI 1640834) and the National Institutes of Health (NCATS UL1 TR002014-01), and the Center for Big Data Analytics and Discovery Informatics which is co-sponsored by the Institute for Cyberscience, the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, and the Social Science Research Institute at the Pennsylvania State University, and the Edward Frymoyer Endowed Professorship at Pennsylvania State University and the Sudha Murty Distinguished Visiting Chair in Neurocomputing and Data Science sponsored by the Pratiksha Trust at the Indian Institute of Science (both held by Vasant G. Honavar).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - RNA-protein interactions play essential roles in regulating gene expression. While some RNA-protein interactions are “specific”, that is, the RNA-binding proteins preferentially bind to particular RNA sequence or structural motifs, others are “non-RNA specific.” Deciphering the protein-RNA recognition code is essential for comprehending the functional implications of these interactions and for developing new therapies for many diseases. Because of the high cost of experimental determination of protein-RNA interfaces, there is a need for computational methods to identify RNA-binding residues in proteins. While most of the existing computational methods for predicting RNA-binding residues in RNA-binding proteins are oblivious to the characteristics of the partner RNA, there is growing interest in methods for partner-specific prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins. In this work, we assess the performance of two recently published partner-specific protein-RNA interface prediction tools, PS-PRIP, and PRIdictor, along with our own new tools. Specifically, we introduce a novel metric, RNA-specificity metric (RSM), for quantifying the RNA-specificity of the RNA binding residues predicted by such tools. Our results show that the RNA-binding residues predicted by previously published methods are oblivious to the characteristics of the putative RNA binding partner. Moreover, when evaluated using partner-agnostic metrics, RNA partner-specific methods are outperformed by the state-of-the-art partner-agnostic methods. We conjecture that either (a) the protein-RNA complexes in PDB are not representative of the protein-RNA interactions in nature, or (b) the current methods for partner-specific prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins fail to account for the differences in RNA partner-specific versus partner-agnostic protein-RNA interactions, or both.
AB - RNA-protein interactions play essential roles in regulating gene expression. While some RNA-protein interactions are “specific”, that is, the RNA-binding proteins preferentially bind to particular RNA sequence or structural motifs, others are “non-RNA specific.” Deciphering the protein-RNA recognition code is essential for comprehending the functional implications of these interactions and for developing new therapies for many diseases. Because of the high cost of experimental determination of protein-RNA interfaces, there is a need for computational methods to identify RNA-binding residues in proteins. While most of the existing computational methods for predicting RNA-binding residues in RNA-binding proteins are oblivious to the characteristics of the partner RNA, there is growing interest in methods for partner-specific prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins. In this work, we assess the performance of two recently published partner-specific protein-RNA interface prediction tools, PS-PRIP, and PRIdictor, along with our own new tools. Specifically, we introduce a novel metric, RNA-specificity metric (RSM), for quantifying the RNA-specificity of the RNA binding residues predicted by such tools. Our results show that the RNA-binding residues predicted by previously published methods are oblivious to the characteristics of the putative RNA binding partner. Moreover, when evaluated using partner-agnostic metrics, RNA partner-specific methods are outperformed by the state-of-the-art partner-agnostic methods. We conjecture that either (a) the protein-RNA complexes in PDB are not representative of the protein-RNA interactions in nature, or (b) the current methods for partner-specific prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins fail to account for the differences in RNA partner-specific versus partner-agnostic protein-RNA interactions, or both.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059255576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059255576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/prot.25639
DO - 10.1002/prot.25639
M3 - Article
C2 - 30536635
AN - SCOPUS:85059255576
SN - 0887-3585
VL - 87
SP - 198
EP - 211
JO - Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics
JF - Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics
IS - 3
ER -