TY - JOUR
T1 - Passive seismic imaging of subwavelength natural fractures
T2 - Theory and 2-D synthetic and ultrasonic data tests
AU - Zhu, Tieyuan
N1 - Funding Information:
I am thankful to the Editor Herve Chauris, and two anonymous reviewers whose comments improved the quality of the paper. I thank Junzhe Sun and Sergey Fomel for their valuable input at the early stage of this study, Dylan Mikesell making the ultrasonic data available. The research was supported by the startup funding from Department of Geosciences and Institute of Natural Gas Research at the Pennsylvania State University.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - I present a source-independent fracture imaging method to use passive seismic data for mapping subwavelength natural fractures. Unlike conventional source-dependent imaging that often adopts reflection-type seismic imaging with known source that is not available in passive seismic surveys, the proposed fracture imaging approach relies on the transmission and diffraction data without the need for source information. I assume that passive seismic data can be decomposed into two types of data: primary transmission wave data and diffraction (coda) wave data. The imaging formula states that primary waves should coincide with coda waves at scatterer points at the time of scattering. Instead of generating source wavefields in the conventional imaging method, the proposed method only need to propagate transmission wave data and diffraction wave data from the receiver arrays and apply an imaging condition to produce an image of fractures. This imaging procedure can be used for processing P wave or S wave. In synthetic examples, I evaluate the proposed method in several aspects: inaccurate source location, inaccurate velocity model, sparse receivers and irregular receiver spacing, elastic data and joint surface and borehole acquisitions. I found that the proposed approach performed well (or even better) comparable to source-dependent fracture imaging when assuming exact source information is known. With perturbed source locations with random shifts (e.g. estimated source location with errors), however, fractures were missing in the source-dependent fracture imaging results but the proposed approach was not influenced. In the presence of velocity errors and sparse and irregular receiver spacing, the proposed method produces better fracture images than the source-dependent imaging results.
AB - I present a source-independent fracture imaging method to use passive seismic data for mapping subwavelength natural fractures. Unlike conventional source-dependent imaging that often adopts reflection-type seismic imaging with known source that is not available in passive seismic surveys, the proposed fracture imaging approach relies on the transmission and diffraction data without the need for source information. I assume that passive seismic data can be decomposed into two types of data: primary transmission wave data and diffraction (coda) wave data. The imaging formula states that primary waves should coincide with coda waves at scatterer points at the time of scattering. Instead of generating source wavefields in the conventional imaging method, the proposed method only need to propagate transmission wave data and diffraction wave data from the receiver arrays and apply an imaging condition to produce an image of fractures. This imaging procedure can be used for processing P wave or S wave. In synthetic examples, I evaluate the proposed method in several aspects: inaccurate source location, inaccurate velocity model, sparse receivers and irregular receiver spacing, elastic data and joint surface and borehole acquisitions. I found that the proposed approach performed well (or even better) comparable to source-dependent fracture imaging when assuming exact source information is known. With perturbed source locations with random shifts (e.g. estimated source location with errors), however, fractures were missing in the source-dependent fracture imaging results but the proposed approach was not influenced. In the presence of velocity errors and sparse and irregular receiver spacing, the proposed method produces better fracture images than the source-dependent imaging results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062227241&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062227241&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/gji/ggy529
DO - 10.1093/gji/ggy529
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062227241
SN - 0956-540X
VL - 216
SP - 1831
EP - 1841
JO - Geophysical Journal International
JF - Geophysical Journal International
IS - 3
ER -