TY - JOUR
T1 - Pathways through which water, sanitation, hygiene, and nutrition interventions reduce antibiotic use in young children
T2 - a mediation analysis of a cohort nested within a cluster-randomized trial
AU - Nguyen, Anna T.
AU - Heitmann, Gabby Barratt
AU - Mertens, Andrew
AU - Ashraf, Sania
AU - Rahman, Md Ziaur
AU - Ali, Shahjahan
AU - Rahman, Mahbub
AU - Arnold, Benjamin F.
AU - Grembi, Jessica A.
AU - Lin, Audrie
AU - Ercumen, Ayse
AU - Benjamin-Chung, Jade
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Background: Low-cost, household-level water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and nutrition interventions can reduce pediatric antibiotic use, but the mechanism through which interventions reduce antibiotic use has not been investigated. Methods: We conducted a causal mediation analysis using data collected between September 2013 and October 2015 from a cohort nested within the WASH Benefits Bangladesh cluster-randomized trial (NCT01590095). Among a subsample of children within the WASH, nutrition, nutrition + WASH, and control arms (N = 1409 children; 267 clusters), we recorded caregiver-reported antibiotic use at ages 14 and 28 months and collected stool at age 14 months. Our primary outcome was any caregiver-reported antibiotic use by index children within the past 30 or 90 days measured at age 14 and 28 months. Mediators included caregiver-reported child diarrhea, acute respiratory infection (ARI), and fever; and enteric pathogen carriage in stool measured by qPCR. Both intervention-mediator and mediator-outcome models were controlled for mediator-outcome confounders. Findings: The receipt of any WASH or nutrition intervention reduced caregiver-reported antibiotic use through all pathways in the past month by 5.5 percentage points (95% CI 1.2, 9.9), from 49.5% (95% CI 45.9%, 53.0%) in the control group to 45.0% (95% CI 42.7%, 47.2%) in the pooled intervention group. When separating this effect into different pathways, we found that interventions reduced antibiotic use by 0.6 percentage points (95% CI 0.1, 1.3) through reduced diarrhea, 0.7 percentage points (95% CI 0.1, 1.5) through reduced ARI with fever, and 1.5 percentage points (95% CI 0.4, 3.0) through reduced prevalence of enteric viruses. Interventions reduced antibiotic use through any of these measured mediators by 2.1 percentage points (95% CI −0.3, 4.5). Interpretation: WASH and nutrition interventions reduced pediatric antibiotic use through the prevention of enteric and respiratory infections in a rural, low-income population. Given that many of these infections are caused by viruses or parasites, WASH and nutrition interventions may help reduce inappropriate antibiotic use in similar settings. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
AB - Background: Low-cost, household-level water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and nutrition interventions can reduce pediatric antibiotic use, but the mechanism through which interventions reduce antibiotic use has not been investigated. Methods: We conducted a causal mediation analysis using data collected between September 2013 and October 2015 from a cohort nested within the WASH Benefits Bangladesh cluster-randomized trial (NCT01590095). Among a subsample of children within the WASH, nutrition, nutrition + WASH, and control arms (N = 1409 children; 267 clusters), we recorded caregiver-reported antibiotic use at ages 14 and 28 months and collected stool at age 14 months. Our primary outcome was any caregiver-reported antibiotic use by index children within the past 30 or 90 days measured at age 14 and 28 months. Mediators included caregiver-reported child diarrhea, acute respiratory infection (ARI), and fever; and enteric pathogen carriage in stool measured by qPCR. Both intervention-mediator and mediator-outcome models were controlled for mediator-outcome confounders. Findings: The receipt of any WASH or nutrition intervention reduced caregiver-reported antibiotic use through all pathways in the past month by 5.5 percentage points (95% CI 1.2, 9.9), from 49.5% (95% CI 45.9%, 53.0%) in the control group to 45.0% (95% CI 42.7%, 47.2%) in the pooled intervention group. When separating this effect into different pathways, we found that interventions reduced antibiotic use by 0.6 percentage points (95% CI 0.1, 1.3) through reduced diarrhea, 0.7 percentage points (95% CI 0.1, 1.5) through reduced ARI with fever, and 1.5 percentage points (95% CI 0.4, 3.0) through reduced prevalence of enteric viruses. Interventions reduced antibiotic use through any of these measured mediators by 2.1 percentage points (95% CI −0.3, 4.5). Interpretation: WASH and nutrition interventions reduced pediatric antibiotic use through the prevention of enteric and respiratory infections in a rural, low-income population. Given that many of these infections are caused by viruses or parasites, WASH and nutrition interventions may help reduce inappropriate antibiotic use in similar settings. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219735186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85219735186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103147
DO - 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103147
M3 - Article
C2 - 40123738
AN - SCOPUS:85219735186
SN - 2589-5370
VL - 82
JO - EClinicalMedicine
JF - EClinicalMedicine
M1 - 103147
ER -