TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient flow in the emergency department
T2 - A classification and analysis of admission process policies
AU - Kang, Hyojung
AU - Nembhard, Harriet Black
AU - Rafferty, Colleen
AU - Deflitch, Christopher J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 by the American College of Emergency Physicians.
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - Study objective: We investigate the effect of admission process policies on patient flow in the emergency department (ED).Methods: We surveyed an advisory panel group to determine approaches to admission process policies and classified them as admission decision is made by the team of providers (attending physicians, residents, physician extenders) (type 1) or attending physicians (type 2) on the admitting service, team of providers (type 3), or attending physicians (type 4) in the ED. We developed discrete-event simulation models of patient flow to evaluate the potential effect of the 4 basic policy types and 2 hybrid types, referred to as triage attending physician consultation and remote collaborative consultation on key performance measures.Results: Compared with the current admission process policy (type 1), the alternatives were all effective in reducing the length of stay of admitted patients by 14% to 26%. In other words, patients may spend 1.4 to 2.5 hours fewer on average in the ED before being admitted to internal medicine under a new admission process policy. The improved flow of admitted patients decreased both the ED length of stay of discharged patients and the overall length of stay by up to 5% and 6.4%, respectively. These results are framed in context of teaching mission and physician experience.Conclusion: An efficient admission process can reduce waiting times for both admitted and discharged ED patients. This study contributed to demonstrating the potential value of leveraging admission process policies and developing a framework for pursuing these policies.
AB - Study objective: We investigate the effect of admission process policies on patient flow in the emergency department (ED).Methods: We surveyed an advisory panel group to determine approaches to admission process policies and classified them as admission decision is made by the team of providers (attending physicians, residents, physician extenders) (type 1) or attending physicians (type 2) on the admitting service, team of providers (type 3), or attending physicians (type 4) in the ED. We developed discrete-event simulation models of patient flow to evaluate the potential effect of the 4 basic policy types and 2 hybrid types, referred to as triage attending physician consultation and remote collaborative consultation on key performance measures.Results: Compared with the current admission process policy (type 1), the alternatives were all effective in reducing the length of stay of admitted patients by 14% to 26%. In other words, patients may spend 1.4 to 2.5 hours fewer on average in the ED before being admitted to internal medicine under a new admission process policy. The improved flow of admitted patients decreased both the ED length of stay of discharged patients and the overall length of stay by up to 5% and 6.4%, respectively. These results are framed in context of teaching mission and physician experience.Conclusion: An efficient admission process can reduce waiting times for both admitted and discharged ED patients. This study contributed to demonstrating the potential value of leveraging admission process policies and developing a framework for pursuing these policies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908090888&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908090888&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.011
DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 24875896
AN - SCOPUS:84908090888
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 64
SP - 335-342.e8
JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine
JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine
IS - 4
ER -