TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient recruitment into a multicenter clinical cohort linking electronic health records from 5 health systems
T2 - Cross-sectional analysis
AU - Bennett, Wendy L.
AU - Bramante, Carolyn T.
AU - Rothenberger, Scott D.
AU - Kraschnewski, Jennifer L.
AU - Herring, Sharon J.
AU - Lent, Michelle R.
AU - Clark, Jeanne M.
AU - Conroy, Molly B.
AU - Lehmann, Harold
AU - Cappella, Nickie
AU - Gauvey-Kern, Megan
AU - McCullough, Jody
AU - McTigue, Kathleen M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Journal of Medical Internet Research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Background: There is growing interest in identifying and recruiting research participants from health systems using electronic health records (EHRs). However, few studies have described the practical aspects of the recruitment process or compared electronic recruitment methods to in-person recruitment, particularly across health systems. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the steps and efficiency of the recruitment process and participant characteristics by recruitment strategy. Methods: EHR-based eligibility criteria included being an adult patient engaged in outpatient primary or bariatric surgery care at one of 5 health systems in the PaTH Clinical Research Network and having ≥2 weight measurements and 1 height measurement recorded in their EHR within the last 5 years. Recruitment strategies varied by site and included one or more of the following methods: (1) in-person recruitment by study staff from clinical sites, (2) US postal mail recruitment letters, (3) secure email, and (4) direct EHR recruitment through secure patient web portals. We used descriptive statistics to evaluate participant characteristics and proportion of patients recruited (ie, efficiency) by modality. Results: The total number of eligible patients from the 5 health systems was 5, 051, 187. Of these, 40, 048 (0.8%) were invited to enter an EHR-based cohort study and 1085 were enrolled. Recruitment efficiency was highest for in-person recruitment (33.5%), followed by electronic messaging (2.9%), including email (2.9%) and EHR patient portal messages (2.9%). Overall, 779 (65.7%) patients were enrolled through electronic messaging, which also showed greater rates of recruitment of Black patients compared with the other strategies. Conclusions: We recruited a total of 1085 patients from primary care and bariatric surgery settings using 4 recruitment strategies. The recruitment efficiency was 2.9% for email and EHR patient portals, with the majority of participants recruited electronically. This study can inform the design of future research studies using EHR-based recruitment.
AB - Background: There is growing interest in identifying and recruiting research participants from health systems using electronic health records (EHRs). However, few studies have described the practical aspects of the recruitment process or compared electronic recruitment methods to in-person recruitment, particularly across health systems. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the steps and efficiency of the recruitment process and participant characteristics by recruitment strategy. Methods: EHR-based eligibility criteria included being an adult patient engaged in outpatient primary or bariatric surgery care at one of 5 health systems in the PaTH Clinical Research Network and having ≥2 weight measurements and 1 height measurement recorded in their EHR within the last 5 years. Recruitment strategies varied by site and included one or more of the following methods: (1) in-person recruitment by study staff from clinical sites, (2) US postal mail recruitment letters, (3) secure email, and (4) direct EHR recruitment through secure patient web portals. We used descriptive statistics to evaluate participant characteristics and proportion of patients recruited (ie, efficiency) by modality. Results: The total number of eligible patients from the 5 health systems was 5, 051, 187. Of these, 40, 048 (0.8%) were invited to enter an EHR-based cohort study and 1085 were enrolled. Recruitment efficiency was highest for in-person recruitment (33.5%), followed by electronic messaging (2.9%), including email (2.9%) and EHR patient portal messages (2.9%). Overall, 779 (65.7%) patients were enrolled through electronic messaging, which also showed greater rates of recruitment of Black patients compared with the other strategies. Conclusions: We recruited a total of 1085 patients from primary care and bariatric surgery settings using 4 recruitment strategies. The recruitment efficiency was 2.9% for email and EHR patient portals, with the majority of participants recruited electronically. This study can inform the design of future research studies using EHR-based recruitment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106921594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106921594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2196/24003
DO - 10.2196/24003
M3 - Article
C2 - 34042604
AN - SCOPUS:85106921594
SN - 1439-4456
VL - 23
JO - Journal of medical Internet research
JF - Journal of medical Internet research
IS - 5
M1 - e24003
ER -