Abstract
Many unions in the United States have for several years engaged in what is known as pattern bargaining. In this article, we show that pattern bargaining is preferred by a union to both simultaneous industry-wide negotiations and sequential negotiations without a pattern. Allowing for interfirm productivity differentials within an industry, we show that for small differentials, the union most prefers a pattern in wages, but for a sufficiently wide differential, the union prefers a pattern in labor costs. Finally, we demonstrate that pattern bargaining can be a significant entry deterrent. This provides an explanation for why incumbent firms in an industry may support the use of pattern bargaining in labor negotiations.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 239-255 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | International Economic Review |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2004 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Economics and Econometrics