TY - JOUR
T1 - Pattern of impaired working memory during major depression
AU - Rose, E. J.
AU - Ebmeier, K. P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded in part by a research studentship from the UK Medical Research Council (EJR) and by the Gordon Small Charitable Trust (KPE).
PY - 2006/2
Y1 - 2006/2
N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to assess working memory (WM) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), using a robust parametric WM task (the n-back task). Methods: Twenty patients with MDD and twenty healthy controls completed a visual version of the paradigm, comprising four levels of task difficulty (i.e. 0-, 1-, 2-, and 3-back). Performance accuracy and reaction time (RT) were measured at each difficulty level. Results: In comparison with controls, patients with MDD exhibited slower RTs (F(1,38) = 25.16, p < 0.001), and reduced accuracy (F(1,38) = 5.93, p < 0.001). There was no diagnosis-specific effect of task difficulty on performance accuracy. However, the faster response to memory (1-3-back) than to shadowing (0-back) tasks observed in controls was not as pronounced in patients. Conclusions: These observations support a relatively specific impairment of WM/central executive function in MDD, which may potentially mediate the diverse pattern of cognitive dysfunction noted in MDD. The parametric n-back task is applicable to subjects with MDD and yields results interpretable across the dimensions of task difficulty and performance in controls and patients.
AB - Background: The aim of this study was to assess working memory (WM) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), using a robust parametric WM task (the n-back task). Methods: Twenty patients with MDD and twenty healthy controls completed a visual version of the paradigm, comprising four levels of task difficulty (i.e. 0-, 1-, 2-, and 3-back). Performance accuracy and reaction time (RT) were measured at each difficulty level. Results: In comparison with controls, patients with MDD exhibited slower RTs (F(1,38) = 25.16, p < 0.001), and reduced accuracy (F(1,38) = 5.93, p < 0.001). There was no diagnosis-specific effect of task difficulty on performance accuracy. However, the faster response to memory (1-3-back) than to shadowing (0-back) tasks observed in controls was not as pronounced in patients. Conclusions: These observations support a relatively specific impairment of WM/central executive function in MDD, which may potentially mediate the diverse pattern of cognitive dysfunction noted in MDD. The parametric n-back task is applicable to subjects with MDD and yields results interpretable across the dimensions of task difficulty and performance in controls and patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31844434337&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31844434337&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2005.11.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2005.11.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 16364451
AN - SCOPUS:31844434337
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 90
SP - 149
EP - 161
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
IS - 2-3
ER -