TY - JOUR
T1 - Pattern of pressure gradient alterations after venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension predicts stent-Adjacent stenosis
T2 - A proposed classification system
AU - Raper, Daniel
AU - Buell, Thomas J.
AU - Ding, Dale
AU - Chen, Ching Jen
AU - Starke, Robert M.
AU - Liu, Kenneth C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Objective Venous sinus stenting (VSS) is a safe and effective treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) with angiographic venous sinus stenosis. However, predictors of stent-Adjacent stenosis (SAS) remain poorly defined. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 47 patients with IIH and intracranial venous stenosis who underwent VSS with pre-and post-stent venography. Patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes were reviewed. Changes in pressure gradient after VSS were classified according to pattern of gradient resolution into types I-III. Results Type I gradient resolution, in which mean venous pressure (MVP) in the transverse sinus (TS) decreases towards MVP in the sigmoid sinus (SS), occurred in 18 patients (38.3%). Type II gradient resolution pattern, in which SS MVP increases towards that in the TS, occurred in 7patients (14.9%). Type III pattern, in which MVP equilibrates to a middle value, occurred in 22patients (46.8%). SAS occurred in 0%, 28.6%, and 22.7% of patients in types I, II and III, respectively. Compared with patients with type I gradient resolution, SAS was more common in those with type II (p=0.0181) and type III (p=0.0306) patterns. Conclusions The pattern of change in the trans-stenosis venous pressure gradient may be predictive of SAS and is a useful tool for classifying the response of the venous obstruction to stenting. A type I pattern appears to represent the ideal response to VSS. Some patients with type II and III changes, particularly if they have other predictors of recurrent stenosis, may benefit from longer initial stent constructs.
AB - Objective Venous sinus stenting (VSS) is a safe and effective treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) with angiographic venous sinus stenosis. However, predictors of stent-Adjacent stenosis (SAS) remain poorly defined. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 47 patients with IIH and intracranial venous stenosis who underwent VSS with pre-and post-stent venography. Patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes were reviewed. Changes in pressure gradient after VSS were classified according to pattern of gradient resolution into types I-III. Results Type I gradient resolution, in which mean venous pressure (MVP) in the transverse sinus (TS) decreases towards MVP in the sigmoid sinus (SS), occurred in 18 patients (38.3%). Type II gradient resolution pattern, in which SS MVP increases towards that in the TS, occurred in 7patients (14.9%). Type III pattern, in which MVP equilibrates to a middle value, occurred in 22patients (46.8%). SAS occurred in 0%, 28.6%, and 22.7% of patients in types I, II and III, respectively. Compared with patients with type I gradient resolution, SAS was more common in those with type II (p=0.0181) and type III (p=0.0306) patterns. Conclusions The pattern of change in the trans-stenosis venous pressure gradient may be predictive of SAS and is a useful tool for classifying the response of the venous obstruction to stenting. A type I pattern appears to represent the ideal response to VSS. Some patients with type II and III changes, particularly if they have other predictors of recurrent stenosis, may benefit from longer initial stent constructs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026320371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026320371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013135
DO - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013135
M3 - Article
C2 - 28637822
AN - SCOPUS:85026320371
SN - 1759-8478
VL - 10
SP - 391
EP - 394
JO - Journal of neurointerventional surgery
JF - Journal of neurointerventional surgery
IS - 4
ER -