TY - JOUR
T1 - Pension Systems and Labour Resistance in Post-socialist China and Vietnam
T2 - A Welfare Regime Analysis
AU - Chan, Chris King Chi
AU - Hui, Elaine Sio Ieng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Journal of Contemporary Asia.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Situated within the literature on welfare regimes, this article investigates workers’ contestation of pension arrangements in post-socialist, authoritarian China and Vietnam, and considers the effects of their actions. Scholars have highlighted economic, cultural, political regime type and political institutions as factors crucial to understanding the welfare regimes of China and Vietnam. However, the “labour factor”–that is, how worker resistance and mobilisation shape welfare provisions–has been under-explored. Focusing on pension provisions in China and Vietnam, this article contends that a labour perspective can deepen knowledge of pension systems and welfare regimes in these two countries. Based on case studies of two notable strikes, interviews and documentary research, this article illustrates that, against the background of transitioning from state socialism to market-Leninism, pension provisions and welfare regimes in China and Vietnam have been constantly contested by workers. It also shows that labour resistance has influenced welfare arrangements at various levels in both countries, and that the Vietnamese state was more accommodating to workers’ pension demands than the Chinese state, because of its more strongly redistributive orientation and, relatively, a less controlling political system.
AB - Situated within the literature on welfare regimes, this article investigates workers’ contestation of pension arrangements in post-socialist, authoritarian China and Vietnam, and considers the effects of their actions. Scholars have highlighted economic, cultural, political regime type and political institutions as factors crucial to understanding the welfare regimes of China and Vietnam. However, the “labour factor”–that is, how worker resistance and mobilisation shape welfare provisions–has been under-explored. Focusing on pension provisions in China and Vietnam, this article contends that a labour perspective can deepen knowledge of pension systems and welfare regimes in these two countries. Based on case studies of two notable strikes, interviews and documentary research, this article illustrates that, against the background of transitioning from state socialism to market-Leninism, pension provisions and welfare regimes in China and Vietnam have been constantly contested by workers. It also shows that labour resistance has influenced welfare arrangements at various levels in both countries, and that the Vietnamese state was more accommodating to workers’ pension demands than the Chinese state, because of its more strongly redistributive orientation and, relatively, a less controlling political system.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125256995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125256995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00472336.2021.2016246
DO - 10.1080/00472336.2021.2016246
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125256995
SN - 0047-2336
VL - 53
SP - 233
EP - 252
JO - Journal of Contemporary Asia
JF - Journal of Contemporary Asia
IS - 2
ER -