TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceptions of similarity and response to selected comparison targets in type 2 diabetes
AU - Arigo, Danielle
AU - Smyth, Joshua M.
AU - Suls, Jerry M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2015/10/3
Y1 - 2015/10/3
N2 - Objective: Social comparisons (i.e. self-evaluations relative to others) may affect motivation for diabetes self-care behaviours. Comparisons can have either positive or negative effects, but it is not clear what differentiates these responses. This study tested the effect of a patient’s perceived similarity to a comparison target on motivation for self-care. Design: Individuals with type 2 diabetes (n = 180, MA1c = 7.59%) selected to read one of four brief descriptions of a patient with diabetes. Main outcome measures: Participants rated their motivation for self-care behaviours prior and subsequent to reading and reported the extent to which they focused on similarities between the self and the selected patient while reading. Results: Perceived similarity moderated the effect of selection on motivation for self-care (p = .01, η2=.06). Increased motivation was observed if participants focused on similarities with patients ‘doing better’ (i.e. high coping effectiveness/low symptom severity) and decreased motivation if they focused on similarities with patients ‘doing worse’ (low coping effectiveness/high symptom severity). Conclusions: Providing social comparison information in diabetes management (and perhaps other chronic diseases) may improve motivation for self-care among some patients. A subset of patients, however, may benefit from guidance to focus on similarities with certain targets.
AB - Objective: Social comparisons (i.e. self-evaluations relative to others) may affect motivation for diabetes self-care behaviours. Comparisons can have either positive or negative effects, but it is not clear what differentiates these responses. This study tested the effect of a patient’s perceived similarity to a comparison target on motivation for self-care. Design: Individuals with type 2 diabetes (n = 180, MA1c = 7.59%) selected to read one of four brief descriptions of a patient with diabetes. Main outcome measures: Participants rated their motivation for self-care behaviours prior and subsequent to reading and reported the extent to which they focused on similarities between the self and the selected patient while reading. Results: Perceived similarity moderated the effect of selection on motivation for self-care (p = .01, η2=.06). Increased motivation was observed if participants focused on similarities with patients ‘doing better’ (i.e. high coping effectiveness/low symptom severity) and decreased motivation if they focused on similarities with patients ‘doing worse’ (low coping effectiveness/high symptom severity). Conclusions: Providing social comparison information in diabetes management (and perhaps other chronic diseases) may improve motivation for self-care among some patients. A subset of patients, however, may benefit from guidance to focus on similarities with certain targets.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938994854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938994854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2015.1040018
DO - 10.1080/08870446.2015.1040018
M3 - Article
C2 - 25871344
AN - SCOPUS:84938994854
SN - 0887-0446
VL - 30
SP - 1206
EP - 1220
JO - Psychology and Health
JF - Psychology and Health
IS - 10
ER -