TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of typically developing four- and five-year-old children with AAC systems using different language organization techniques
AU - Light, Janice
AU - Drager, Kathryn
AU - McCarthy, John
AU - Mellott, Suzanne
AU - Millar, Diane
AU - Parrish, Craig
AU - Parsons, Arielle
AU - Rhoads, Stacy
AU - Ward, Maricka
AU - Welliver, Michelle
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper is dedicated to Craig Parrish (1955 – 1999) who touched us greatly with his keen intellect, his love of learning, his laughter, and his deep caring for others. This research project was completed as part of the Communication Enhancement Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center (AAC-RERC). The AAC-RERC is a virtual research center that is funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) of the U.S. Department of Education under grant number H133E980026. The opinions contained in this publication are those of the grantees and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Education. For additional information on the AAC-RERC, see http://www.aac-rerc.org/. The authors wish to thank David Beukelman and the AAC-RERC research team at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln for their assistance in the development of these studies as well as the other partners in the AAC-RERC: Sarah Blackstone, Diane Bryen, Kevin Caves, Frank DeRuyter, Jeff Higginbotham, David McNaughton, and Janet Sturm. This paper is partially based on presentations at the biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Washington, DC, August, 2000. For further information, contact Janice Light, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 110 Moore Building, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; E-mail [email protected]
PY - 2004/6
Y1 - 2004/6
N2 - In this paper, the results of two studies designed to investigate the learning demands of four different approaches to the layout and organization of language in electronic augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems are presented: taxonomic grid, schematic grid, schematic scene, and iconic encoding techniques. A total of 80 typically developing children participated in the two studies: 40 four-year-olds (Study 1) and 40 five-year-olds (Study 2). Ten children in each study were randomly assigned to each of the four system organization conditions. The children were introduced to target vocabulary items (24 items for the 4-year-olds and 30 for the 5-year-olds) in a series of four learning and testing sessions. Half of the vocabulary items were concrete concepts and half were abstract concepts. Results of the studies indicated that the 4-year-old and 5-year-old children were more accurate locating target vocabulary in the three dynamic display conditions (taxonomic grid, schematic grid, schematic scene) than in the iconic encoding condition. On initial exposure to the systems, the iconic encoding technique was not at all transparent to the children; the other three systems were only moderately transparent. All but one of the 4-year-old children and all of the 5-year-old children demonstrated gains in accuracy across the learning sessions; gains were significantly greater for the three dynamic display conditions than for the iconic encoding condition. The children were more accurate with the concrete vocabulary items than the abstract ones. There was some, albeit limited, evidence that the children generalized to facilitate learning of novel vocabulary items. Results are discussed with reference to the literature. Implications for practice and directions for future research are also discussed.
AB - In this paper, the results of two studies designed to investigate the learning demands of four different approaches to the layout and organization of language in electronic augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems are presented: taxonomic grid, schematic grid, schematic scene, and iconic encoding techniques. A total of 80 typically developing children participated in the two studies: 40 four-year-olds (Study 1) and 40 five-year-olds (Study 2). Ten children in each study were randomly assigned to each of the four system organization conditions. The children were introduced to target vocabulary items (24 items for the 4-year-olds and 30 for the 5-year-olds) in a series of four learning and testing sessions. Half of the vocabulary items were concrete concepts and half were abstract concepts. Results of the studies indicated that the 4-year-old and 5-year-old children were more accurate locating target vocabulary in the three dynamic display conditions (taxonomic grid, schematic grid, schematic scene) than in the iconic encoding condition. On initial exposure to the systems, the iconic encoding technique was not at all transparent to the children; the other three systems were only moderately transparent. All but one of the 4-year-old children and all of the 5-year-old children demonstrated gains in accuracy across the learning sessions; gains were significantly greater for the three dynamic display conditions than for the iconic encoding condition. The children were more accurate with the concrete vocabulary items than the abstract ones. There was some, albeit limited, evidence that the children generalized to facilitate learning of novel vocabulary items. Results are discussed with reference to the literature. Implications for practice and directions for future research are also discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942648621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942648621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07434610410001655553
DO - 10.1080/07434610410001655553
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:2942648621
SN - 0743-4618
VL - 20
SP - 63
EP - 88
JO - AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication
JF - AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication
IS - 2
ER -