Perished or published: The fate of presentations from the ninth ACRL conference

Joseph Fennewald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations


The scientific merit of the Ninth ACRL Conference is assessed by tracking the subsequent publication of its presentations. The results indicate that presentations in all formats-papers, panels, posters, and round-tables-achieved publication in refereed journals. Papers and panels were more likely to be published (18%) than posters and roundtables (8%). Overall, 13 percent of all presentations became refereed articles. In addition, eight percent of the presentations were based on prior publications. The rate of subsequent publication identified here is similar to that of a previous study of a library conference. However, it is much lower than rates reported for medical and scientific conferences. This may suggest that the ACRL conference resembles a technical, not a scientific, meeting with an emphasis on presenting best practices rather than disseminating research. This study should be replicated to determine if the publication of presentations is higher at other and future library conferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)517-525
Number of pages9
JournalCollege and Research Libraries
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 2005

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Library and Information Sciences


Dive into the research topics of 'Perished or published: The fate of presentations from the ninth ACRL conference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this