TY - JOUR
T1 - Pest management in future climates
T2 - Warming reduces physical weed management effectiveness
AU - Keller, Joseph A.
AU - Shea, Katriona
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank C. Hovis, R. J. Chandler, L. Gazda, J. Spivack, K. Porreca, D. Brough, K. McIlroy, C. J. Fisher, C. Mroz, and R. Lamb for assistance in the field and in the lab. We also thank Austin Kirt, the late Scott Smiles, and the farm managers at the Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center at Rock Springs for access to land and technical support. We thank M. Kaye, H. Inamine, and E. Howerton for helpful comments on this manuscript. Financial support came from the NASA Pennsylvania Space Grant Consortium and from National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture award number 2016‐67011‐24710. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USDA.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Climate change alters many aspects of weed performance and may also alter the effectiveness of management practices to control pests. Despite this concern, entire categories of widely used management practices, such as physical control, remain understudied in this context. We conducted a field experiment growing the invasive pest musk thistle (Carduus nutans) at ambient and experimentally elevated temperatures. We tested mowing management strategies that varied in the timing of a single mowing event relative to thistles' stem elongation phenology and compared these with an unmowed control. Results from this experiment informed demographic models to project population growth rates for different warming/mowing scenarios. Compared to plants grown under ambient conditions, warmed thistles were more likely to survive the same mowing treatment, flowered earlier in the season, grew to taller heights, and produced more flowering capitula. Proportional reductions in plant height and capitulum production caused by mowing were smaller under warming. Warming did not change the relative ranking of mowing treatments; mowing late in the growing season (2 weeks after individuals first reached a height of 40 cm) was most effective at ambient temperatures and under warming. Warming caused significant increases in projected local population growth rate for all mowing treatments. For invasive musk thistle, warmed individuals outperformed individuals grown at ambient temperatures across all the mowing treatments we considered. Our results suggest that to achieve outcomes comparable to those attainable at today's temperatures, farmers will need to apply supplemental management, possibly including additional mowing effort or alternative practices such as chemical control. We recommend that scientists test management practices under experimental warming, where possible, and that managers monitor ongoing management to identify changes in effectiveness. Information about changes in managed weeds' mortality, fecundity, and phenology can then be used to make informed decisions in future climates.
AB - Climate change alters many aspects of weed performance and may also alter the effectiveness of management practices to control pests. Despite this concern, entire categories of widely used management practices, such as physical control, remain understudied in this context. We conducted a field experiment growing the invasive pest musk thistle (Carduus nutans) at ambient and experimentally elevated temperatures. We tested mowing management strategies that varied in the timing of a single mowing event relative to thistles' stem elongation phenology and compared these with an unmowed control. Results from this experiment informed demographic models to project population growth rates for different warming/mowing scenarios. Compared to plants grown under ambient conditions, warmed thistles were more likely to survive the same mowing treatment, flowered earlier in the season, grew to taller heights, and produced more flowering capitula. Proportional reductions in plant height and capitulum production caused by mowing were smaller under warming. Warming did not change the relative ranking of mowing treatments; mowing late in the growing season (2 weeks after individuals first reached a height of 40 cm) was most effective at ambient temperatures and under warming. Warming caused significant increases in projected local population growth rate for all mowing treatments. For invasive musk thistle, warmed individuals outperformed individuals grown at ambient temperatures across all the mowing treatments we considered. Our results suggest that to achieve outcomes comparable to those attainable at today's temperatures, farmers will need to apply supplemental management, possibly including additional mowing effort or alternative practices such as chemical control. We recommend that scientists test management practices under experimental warming, where possible, and that managers monitor ongoing management to identify changes in effectiveness. Information about changes in managed weeds' mortality, fecundity, and phenology can then be used to make informed decisions in future climates.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131175360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131175360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/eap.2633
DO - 10.1002/eap.2633
M3 - Article
C2 - 35403285
AN - SCOPUS:85131175360
SN - 1051-0761
VL - 32
JO - Ecological Applications
JF - Ecological Applications
IS - 6
M1 - e2633
ER -