Pherecydes in Alexandria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Pherecydes of Syros' work is difficult to understand because of its fragmentary nature. A previously unexplored perspective on his work is to analyze how it was understood and used in Ptolemaic Alexandria, particularly by Eratosthenes and Callimachus. Eratosthenes' distinction between Pherecydes of Syros and Pherecydes of Athens (DL 1.119) has been used as a key piece of evidence that those two authors are, in fact, distinct. However, there has been little discussion of Eratosthenes' interest in these authors outside of that statement. Callimachus' interest in Pherecydes has also been ignored by both scholars of Pherecydes and scholars of Alexandrian poetry (except for brief references). Through this examination, I argue that Pherecydes of Syros was an important figure in discussions about the development of prose in Ptolemaic Alexandria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalMnemosyne
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Classics
  • Archaeology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • History
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this