TY - JOUR
T1 - Photo-stability and performance of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in luminescent solar concentrators
AU - Hyldahl, Meredith G.
AU - Bailey, Sheldon T.
AU - Wittmershaus, Bruce P.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to express our appreciation of Evident Technologies for donating critical samples for completing our studies and giving valuable advice on handling the QDs. Samples of Lumogen F Red 300 were kindly donated by BASF with the help of Dr. Steve Goldstein. Our special thanks to Jerry Magraw, Paul Fontecchio, Alex Mooney, and Israel Schultz for their contributions. This research was supported through a Grant from the National Science Foundation, the Division of Electronics and Communications Systems, grant ECCS-0424153. MGH gratefully acknowledges summer support through an undergraduate research grant from the Lord Corporation, Erie, PA. Additional support was received through undergraduate research grants awarded to MGH and STB from Penn State Erie, The Behrend College.
PY - 2009/4
Y1 - 2009/4
N2 - The performances of luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) made with two versions of quantum dots (QDs) with CdSe cores and ZnS shells are compared to LSCs containing the organic dye, Lumogen® F Red 300 (LR), to assess the viability of QD LSCs. In addition to spectroscopic and light collection measurements, the photo-degradation response of the version I (vI) QD LSC is compared to the LR LSC. The measured fluorescence quantum yield of the version II (vII) QDs (57%) is about half that of LR (>90%) and twice that of the vI QDs (31%). Though the quantum yield for vII QDs is lower than LR, the vII QD LSC has nearly twice the short-circuit current of the LR LSCs or the vI QD LSCs when their respective red-peak optical densities are the same in 6.2 × 6.2 × 0.6 cm LSCs. This is a reflection of the main advantage of QDs for use in LSCs, that QDs collect considerably more sunlight than LR due to their broad absorption spectrum. Despite the fact that the QD LSCs absorbs more photons than the LR LSCs, the slow phase of the photo-degradation rate of the QD LSC is approximately five times slower than the LR LSC under nearly constant light exposure. Most surprising is the observation that the photo-degradation of the QD LSC's absorption completely recovers during a prolonged dark cycle. In a normal day/night cycle, this will benefit the performance of the QD LSC.
AB - The performances of luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) made with two versions of quantum dots (QDs) with CdSe cores and ZnS shells are compared to LSCs containing the organic dye, Lumogen® F Red 300 (LR), to assess the viability of QD LSCs. In addition to spectroscopic and light collection measurements, the photo-degradation response of the version I (vI) QD LSC is compared to the LR LSC. The measured fluorescence quantum yield of the version II (vII) QDs (57%) is about half that of LR (>90%) and twice that of the vI QDs (31%). Though the quantum yield for vII QDs is lower than LR, the vII QD LSC has nearly twice the short-circuit current of the LR LSCs or the vI QD LSCs when their respective red-peak optical densities are the same in 6.2 × 6.2 × 0.6 cm LSCs. This is a reflection of the main advantage of QDs for use in LSCs, that QDs collect considerably more sunlight than LR due to their broad absorption spectrum. Despite the fact that the QD LSCs absorbs more photons than the LR LSCs, the slow phase of the photo-degradation rate of the QD LSC is approximately five times slower than the LR LSC under nearly constant light exposure. Most surprising is the observation that the photo-degradation of the QD LSC's absorption completely recovers during a prolonged dark cycle. In a normal day/night cycle, this will benefit the performance of the QD LSC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61849149430&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61849149430&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.solener.2008.10.001
DO - 10.1016/j.solener.2008.10.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:61849149430
SN - 0038-092X
VL - 83
SP - 566
EP - 573
JO - Solar Energy
JF - Solar Energy
IS - 4
ER -