TY - JOUR
T1 - Physical activity and physical fitness assessments in adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer
T2 - a scoping review
AU - Caru, Maxime
AU - Wurz, Amanda
AU - Brunet, Jennifer
AU - Barb, Emily D.
AU - Adams, Scott C.
AU - Roth, Michael E.
AU - Winters-Stone, Kerri
AU - Fidler-Benaoudia, Miranda M.
AU - Dandekar, Smita
AU - Ness, Kirsten K.
AU - Culos-Reed, S. Nicole
AU - Schulte, Fiona
AU - Rao, Pooja
AU - Mizrahi, David
AU - Swartz, Maria Chang
AU - Smith, Marlie
AU - Valle, Carmina G.
AU - Kadan-Lottick, Nina S.
AU - Dieli-Conwright, Christina M.
AU - Schmitz, Kathryn H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Purpose: This scoping review describes the assessment methodologies for physical activity (PA) and physical fitness assessments used in studies focusing on adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with cancer. Methods: A search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library following the PRISMA-ScR statement. A total of 34 studies were included in this review. Results: PA was primarily assessed via self-reported questionnaires (30/34) either completed in-person (n = 17) or online (n = 13) at different time points and different stages along the cancer trajectory (i.e., from diagnosis onward). A total of 9 studies conducted a physical fitness assessment. Conclusions: PA and physical fitness measurements are key when trying to describe outcomes, assess for associations, track changes, measure intervention adherence, and test intervention efficacy and effectiveness. Considerable heterogeneity across studies was reported limiting the generation of formal recommendations or guidance for researchers, healthcare providers, and policy makers. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
AB - Purpose: This scoping review describes the assessment methodologies for physical activity (PA) and physical fitness assessments used in studies focusing on adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with cancer. Methods: A search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library following the PRISMA-ScR statement. A total of 34 studies were included in this review. Results: PA was primarily assessed via self-reported questionnaires (30/34) either completed in-person (n = 17) or online (n = 13) at different time points and different stages along the cancer trajectory (i.e., from diagnosis onward). A total of 9 studies conducted a physical fitness assessment. Conclusions: PA and physical fitness measurements are key when trying to describe outcomes, assess for associations, track changes, measure intervention adherence, and test intervention efficacy and effectiveness. Considerable heterogeneity across studies was reported limiting the generation of formal recommendations or guidance for researchers, healthcare providers, and policy makers. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170394178&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85170394178&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00520-023-08008-7
DO - 10.1007/s00520-023-08008-7
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37695526
AN - SCOPUS:85170394178
SN - 0941-4355
VL - 31
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
IS - 10
M1 - 569
ER -
