TY - JOUR
T1 - Physical activity and pregnancy
T2 - Past and present evidence and future recommendations
AU - Downs, Danielle Symons
AU - Chasan-Taber, Lisa
AU - Evenson, Kelly R.
AU - Leiferman, Jenn
AU - Yeo, Seon Ae
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the following contributions to this paper: The Pennsylvania State University Social Science Research Institute provided funding for Danielle Symons Downs; the National Institutes of Health (NIH) NIDDK074876 provided funding for Lisa Chasan-Taber; the NIH/Na- tional Cancer Institute CA109804-01 provided funding for Kelly R. Evenson, and the National Institute of Nursing Research (NIHR R01NR05002) provided funding for Seo-nAe Yeo. The content is solely the authors’ responsibility and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or university affiliations. Please address correspondence concerning this article to Danielle Symons Downs, Associate Professor of Kinesiology and OBGYN, Exercise Psychology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, 266 Recreation Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Purpose. In this review, we provide researchers and practitioners with an overview of the physical activity and pregnancy literature to promote prenatal physical activity, improve measurement, further elucidate the role of activity in reducing maternal health complications, and inform future research. Method. We examined past and present physical activity and pregnancy studies and highlight key papers with a focus on maternal health outcomes to best inform physical activity promotion efforts. Results. We discuss: (a) historical overview of prenatal physical activity relative to the physical activity guidelines, how they have changed over time, and how evidence of the effect of prenatal activity on maternal/fetal health outcomes has affected clinical recommendations; (b) existing tools and challenges associated with measuring prenatal physical activity; (c) empirical evidence on multilevel determinants of prenatal activity to guide future intervention work; (d) empirical evidence of prenatal activity on adverse maternal outcomes (gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, excessive gestational weight gain) from observational and intervention studies; and (e) summary/recommendations for future research and practice. Conclusions. The physical activity and pregnancy literature has evolved over the past 50 years, and there is sufficient empirical evidence to support the promotion of moderate-to-vigorous prenatal physical activity for maternal health benefits. Future studies and interventions should be carefully designed, theoretically driven, and include validated and reliable activity measures. Researchers and practitioners should also consider the multifaceted determinants and outcomes of prenatal physical activity and intervene to promote physical activity before, during, and after pregnancy.
AB - Purpose. In this review, we provide researchers and practitioners with an overview of the physical activity and pregnancy literature to promote prenatal physical activity, improve measurement, further elucidate the role of activity in reducing maternal health complications, and inform future research. Method. We examined past and present physical activity and pregnancy studies and highlight key papers with a focus on maternal health outcomes to best inform physical activity promotion efforts. Results. We discuss: (a) historical overview of prenatal physical activity relative to the physical activity guidelines, how they have changed over time, and how evidence of the effect of prenatal activity on maternal/fetal health outcomes has affected clinical recommendations; (b) existing tools and challenges associated with measuring prenatal physical activity; (c) empirical evidence on multilevel determinants of prenatal activity to guide future intervention work; (d) empirical evidence of prenatal activity on adverse maternal outcomes (gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, excessive gestational weight gain) from observational and intervention studies; and (e) summary/recommendations for future research and practice. Conclusions. The physical activity and pregnancy literature has evolved over the past 50 years, and there is sufficient empirical evidence to support the promotion of moderate-to-vigorous prenatal physical activity for maternal health benefits. Future studies and interventions should be carefully designed, theoretically driven, and include validated and reliable activity measures. Researchers and practitioners should also consider the multifaceted determinants and outcomes of prenatal physical activity and intervene to promote physical activity before, during, and after pregnancy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008783349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008783349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599138
DO - 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599138
M3 - Article
C2 - 23367811
AN - SCOPUS:85008783349
SN - 0270-1367
VL - 83
SP - 485
EP - 502
JO - Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
JF - Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
IS - 4
ER -