TY - JOUR
T1 - Physiological feelings
AU - Pace-Schott, Edward F.
AU - Amole, Marlissa C.
AU - Aue, Tatjana
AU - Balconi, Michela
AU - Bylsma, Lauren M.
AU - Critchley, Hugo
AU - Demaree, Heath A.
AU - Friedman, Bruce H.
AU - Gooding, Anne Elizabeth Kotynski
AU - Gosseries, Olivia
AU - Jovanovic, Tanja
AU - Kirby, Lauren A.J.
AU - Kozlowska, Kasia
AU - Laureys, Steven
AU - Lowe, Leroy
AU - Magee, Kelsey
AU - Marin, Marie France
AU - Merner, Amanda R.
AU - Robinson, Jennifer L.
AU - Smith, Robert C.
AU - Spangler, Derek P.
AU - Van Overveld, Mark
AU - VanElzakker, Michael B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - The role of peripheral physiology in the experience of emotion has been debated since the 19th century following the seminal proposal by William James that somatic responses to stimuli determine subjective emotion. Subsequent views have integrated the forebrain's ability to initiate, represent and simulate such physiological events. Modern affective neuroscience envisions an interacting network of “bottom-up” and “top-down” signaling in which the peripheral (PNS) and central nervous systems both receive and generate the experience of emotion. “Feelings” serves as a term for the perception of these physical changes whether emanating from actual somatic events or from the brain's representation of such. “Interoception” has come to represent the brain's receipt and representation of these actual and “virtual” somatic changes that may or may not enter conscious awareness but, nonetheless, influence feelings. Such information can originate from diverse sources including endocrine, immune and gastrointestinal systems as well as the PNS. We here examine physiological feelings from diverse perspectives including current and historical theories, evolution, neuroanatomy and physiology, development, regulatory processes, pathology and linguistics.
AB - The role of peripheral physiology in the experience of emotion has been debated since the 19th century following the seminal proposal by William James that somatic responses to stimuli determine subjective emotion. Subsequent views have integrated the forebrain's ability to initiate, represent and simulate such physiological events. Modern affective neuroscience envisions an interacting network of “bottom-up” and “top-down” signaling in which the peripheral (PNS) and central nervous systems both receive and generate the experience of emotion. “Feelings” serves as a term for the perception of these physical changes whether emanating from actual somatic events or from the brain's representation of such. “Interoception” has come to represent the brain's receipt and representation of these actual and “virtual” somatic changes that may or may not enter conscious awareness but, nonetheless, influence feelings. Such information can originate from diverse sources including endocrine, immune and gastrointestinal systems as well as the PNS. We here examine physiological feelings from diverse perspectives including current and historical theories, evolution, neuroanatomy and physiology, development, regulatory processes, pathology and linguistics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065442110&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065442110&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.05.002
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.05.002
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31125635
AN - SCOPUS:85065442110
SN - 0149-7634
VL - 103
SP - 267
EP - 304
JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
ER -