TY - GEN
T1 - Pilot testing of a new design for presentation slides to teach science and engineering
AU - Alley, Michael
AU - Schreiber, Madeline
AU - Muffo, John
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Pilot testing in a large geology course shows that a new sentence-headline design of presentation slides was more effective than the traditional phrase-headline design at teaching science to undergraduates. Rather than having a phrase headline supported by a bullet list, the new design relies on a succinct sentence headline supported by visual evidence. In the new design, bullets are not used. The testing of the new slide design involved comparing test scores between a prior section that viewed the traditional design and the test scores of a current section that viewed the new design. On 7 of the 20 questions, the section viewing the new design achieved improvements in test scores that were statistically significant at the 99.9% confidence level. On no question did the prior section viewing the traditional design achieve a higher test score that was statistically significant. The mean test scores on the 20 questions were 71% correct for the earlier group (traditional design) and 82% correct for the latter group (new design). In addition to analyzing the test scores, we conducted surveys that indicate the students preferred the new design over the traditional design by a more than 7-to-1 ratio. These test scores and survey results have implications in the way that presentation slides should be designed not only for science and engineering classrooms, but also for forums of scientific and engineering research.
AB - Pilot testing in a large geology course shows that a new sentence-headline design of presentation slides was more effective than the traditional phrase-headline design at teaching science to undergraduates. Rather than having a phrase headline supported by a bullet list, the new design relies on a succinct sentence headline supported by visual evidence. In the new design, bullets are not used. The testing of the new slide design involved comparing test scores between a prior section that viewed the traditional design and the test scores of a current section that viewed the new design. On 7 of the 20 questions, the section viewing the new design achieved improvements in test scores that were statistically significant at the 99.9% confidence level. On no question did the prior section viewing the traditional design achieve a higher test score that was statistically significant. The mean test scores on the 20 questions were 71% correct for the earlier group (traditional design) and 82% correct for the latter group (new design). In addition to analyzing the test scores, we conducted surveys that indicate the students preferred the new design over the traditional design by a more than 7-to-1 ratio. These test scores and survey results have implications in the way that presentation slides should be designed not only for science and engineering classrooms, but also for forums of scientific and engineering research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947252794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947252794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33947252794
SN - 0780390776
SN - 9780780390775
T3 - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
SP - S3G-7-S3G-12
BT - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education, 35th Annual Conference
T2 - Frontiers in Education - 35th Annual Conference 2005, FIE' 05
Y2 - 19 October 2005 through 22 October 2005
ER -