TY - JOUR
T1 - Place-based learning processes in a family science workshop
T2 - Discussion prompts supporting families sensemaking and rural science connections using a community water model
AU - McClain, Lucy R.
AU - Chiu, Yu Chen
AU - Zimmerman, Heather Toomey
N1 - Funding Information:
An earlier version of this study was presented at NARST 2020 (remotely). Thank you to Katharine Grills, Zachary McKinley, Soo Hyeon Kim, Michele Crowl, and Susan Land for their contribution to the science workshops and data collection efforts. Our water quality workshop was modified from Penn State Extension's : curriculum (2017). Thank you also to the families who participated in this study. This project was made possible in part by the Institute of Museum and Library Services, grant #MG‐77‐16‐0137‐16. The views, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of the Institute of Museum and Library Services. Rain to Drain Slow the Flow
Funding Information:
An earlier version of this study was presented at NARST 2020 (remotely). Thank you to Katharine Grills, Zachary McKinley, Soo Hyeon Kim, Michele Crowl, and Susan Land for their contribution to the science workshops and data collection efforts. Our water quality workshop was modified from Penn State Extension's Rain to Drain: Slow the Flow curriculum (2017). Thank you also to the families who participated in this study.?This project was made possible in part by the Institute of Museum and Library Services, grant #MG-77-16-0137-16. The views, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - This study addresses intergenerational learning processes in informal settings by investigating families engaging in science talk and practices during a water quality science workshop led by local science experts. As part of a larger design-based research study, this analysis examines how modified Think–Pair–Share discussion prompts within the water quality workshop curriculum supported the families' (a) sensemaking strategies and (b) place-based scientific reasoning about local water sources as they interacted with a community water model. Using sociocultural theories of learning as our foundational basis, we analyzed parent–child interactions and family sensemaking processes that took place in four workshops with 44 h of video data (12 families). Through our analysis, we identified six distinct types of sensemaking conversations that arose during the workshops: (1) family experience connection, (2) rural connection, (3) model contextualizing, (4) parent revoicing, (5) parent questioning, and (6) prediction. We also found that families spatially distributed physical gestures over three media (air, table, community water model) to support different types of sensemaking conversations. Our findings point towards the importance of family discussion prompts in informal programs as a mediational means that connects abstract science topics to local, rural experiences to support family sensemaking practices. Implications for designing family-focused science workshops in informal settings include designing discussion prompts to spark families' personally relevant connections with science and providing ample physical space for families to gesture during sensemaking conversations.
AB - This study addresses intergenerational learning processes in informal settings by investigating families engaging in science talk and practices during a water quality science workshop led by local science experts. As part of a larger design-based research study, this analysis examines how modified Think–Pair–Share discussion prompts within the water quality workshop curriculum supported the families' (a) sensemaking strategies and (b) place-based scientific reasoning about local water sources as they interacted with a community water model. Using sociocultural theories of learning as our foundational basis, we analyzed parent–child interactions and family sensemaking processes that took place in four workshops with 44 h of video data (12 families). Through our analysis, we identified six distinct types of sensemaking conversations that arose during the workshops: (1) family experience connection, (2) rural connection, (3) model contextualizing, (4) parent revoicing, (5) parent questioning, and (6) prediction. We also found that families spatially distributed physical gestures over three media (air, table, community water model) to support different types of sensemaking conversations. Our findings point towards the importance of family discussion prompts in informal programs as a mediational means that connects abstract science topics to local, rural experiences to support family sensemaking practices. Implications for designing family-focused science workshops in informal settings include designing discussion prompts to spark families' personally relevant connections with science and providing ample physical space for families to gesture during sensemaking conversations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124758481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124758481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/sce.21706
DO - 10.1002/sce.21706
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85124758481
SN - 0036-8326
VL - 106
SP - 645
EP - 673
JO - Science Education
JF - Science Education
IS - 3
ER -