TY - JOUR
T1 - Placement and Delinquency Outcomes Among System-Involved Youth Referred to Multisystemic Therapy
T2 - A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
AU - Vidal, Sarah
AU - Steeger, Christine M.
AU - Caron, Colleen
AU - Lasher, Leanne
AU - Connell, Christian M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded, in part, by the Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF) in support of the Rhode Island Data Analytic Center, a collaborative endeavor of Rhode Island DCYF and the Yale University School of Medicine, and by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32 DA 019426; JK Tebes). We would like to thank Brian Renzi and Tim Hynes from Rhode Island DCYF for their technical support of the administrative data used in this study. This work was funded, in part, by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32 DA 019426; JK Tebes). Dr. Sarah Vidal declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Christine Steeger declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Colleen Caron declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Ms. Leanne Lasher declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Christian Connell declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - Multisystemic therapy (MST) was developed to help youth with serious social, emotional, and behavioral problems. Research on the efficacy and effectiveness of MST has shown positive outcomes in different domains of development and functioning among various populations of youth. Nonetheless, even with a large body of literature investigating the treatment effects of MST, few studies have focused on the effectiveness of MST through large-scale dissemination efforts. Utilizing a large sample of youth involved in a statewide dissemination of MST (n = 740; 43% females; 14% Black; 29% Hispanic; 49% White; Mage = 14.9 years), propensity score matching was employed to account for baseline differences between the treatment (n = 577) and comparison (n = 163) groups. Treatment effects were examined based on three outcomes: out-of-home placement, adjudication, and placement in a juvenile training school over a 6-year period. Significant group differences remained after adjusting for baseline differences, with youth who received MST experiencing better outcomes in offending rates than youth who did not have an opportunity to complete MST due to non-clinical or administrative reasons. Survival analyses revealed rates of all three outcomes were approximately 40% lower among the treatment group. Overall, this study adds to the body of literature supporting the long-term effectiveness of MST in reducing offending among high-risk youth. The findings underscore the potential benefits of taking evidence-based programs such as MST to scale to improve the well-being and functioning of high-risk youth. However, strategies to effectively deliver the program in mental health service settings, and to address the specific needs of high-risk youth are necessary.
AB - Multisystemic therapy (MST) was developed to help youth with serious social, emotional, and behavioral problems. Research on the efficacy and effectiveness of MST has shown positive outcomes in different domains of development and functioning among various populations of youth. Nonetheless, even with a large body of literature investigating the treatment effects of MST, few studies have focused on the effectiveness of MST through large-scale dissemination efforts. Utilizing a large sample of youth involved in a statewide dissemination of MST (n = 740; 43% females; 14% Black; 29% Hispanic; 49% White; Mage = 14.9 years), propensity score matching was employed to account for baseline differences between the treatment (n = 577) and comparison (n = 163) groups. Treatment effects were examined based on three outcomes: out-of-home placement, adjudication, and placement in a juvenile training school over a 6-year period. Significant group differences remained after adjusting for baseline differences, with youth who received MST experiencing better outcomes in offending rates than youth who did not have an opportunity to complete MST due to non-clinical or administrative reasons. Survival analyses revealed rates of all three outcomes were approximately 40% lower among the treatment group. Overall, this study adds to the body of literature supporting the long-term effectiveness of MST in reducing offending among high-risk youth. The findings underscore the potential benefits of taking evidence-based programs such as MST to scale to improve the well-being and functioning of high-risk youth. However, strategies to effectively deliver the program in mental health service settings, and to address the specific needs of high-risk youth are necessary.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015648174&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015648174&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10488-017-0797-y
DO - 10.1007/s10488-017-0797-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 28315074
AN - SCOPUS:85015648174
SN - 0894-587X
VL - 44
SP - 853
EP - 866
JO - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
JF - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
IS - 6
ER -