Planets in open clusters detectable by Kepler

Sourav Chatterjee, Eric B. Ford, Aaron M. Geller, Frederic A. Rasio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations


While hundreds of planets have been discovered around field stars, only a few are known in star clusters. To explain the lack of short-period giant planets in globular clusters (GCs), such as 47 Tucane and ω Centauri, it has been suggested that their low metallicities may have prevented planet formation. Alternatively, the high rates of close stellar encounters in these clusters may have influenced the formation and subsequent evolution of planetary systems. How common are planets in clusters around normal main-sequence stars? Here we consider whether this question can be addressed using data from the Kepler mission. The Kepler field of view contains four low-density (relative to GCs) open clusters where the metallicities are about solar (or even higher) and stellar encounters are much less frequent than in typical GCs. We provide detailed N-body models and show that most planets in Kepler-detectable orbits are not significantly perturbed by stellar encounters in these open clusters. We focus on the most massive cluster, NGC 6791, which has supersolar metallicity, and find that if planets formed in this cluster at the same frequency as observed in the field, Kepler could detect 1-20 transiting planets depending on the planet-size distribution and the duration of data collection. Due to the large distance to NGC 6791 Kepler will have to search relatively faint (Kp < 20) stars for the full extended mission to achieve such a yield.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1587-1602
Number of pages16
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Issue number2
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Planets in open clusters detectable by Kepler'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this