TY - JOUR
T1 - Polar Liquid Cloud Base Detection Algorithms for High Spectral Resolution or Micropulse Lidar Data
AU - Silber, Israel
AU - Verlinde, Johannes
AU - Eloranta, Edwin W.
AU - Flynn, Connor J.
AU - Flynn, Donna M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The MPL, MWR, and sounding data used in this study are available in the ARM data archive (http://www.archive.arm. gov). Sounding data for Green Bay, Wisconsin, are available in the NOAA ESRL Radiosonde Database (https://ruc. noaa.gov/raobs/). Ten-second resolu tion HSRL data can be obtained from the University of Wisconsin-Madison HSRL Lidar Group (http://lidar.ssec.wisc. edu). The authors wish to thank Chitra Sivaraman for her assistance with the MPL CMASK VAP and fruitful discussions with Eugene Clothiaux. The research was supported by the National Science Foundation grant PLR-1443495. We thank the three anonymous reviewers whose comments help improve the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
©2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2018/4/27
Y1 - 2018/4/27
N2 - Liquid layers in clouds affect their microphysical processes, as well as the surface energy budget. Studies focusing on these and other areas of research are often in need of skillful estimation of liquid-bearing cloud layer boundaries. The bases of these layers are predominantly determined by ground-based lidar instruments. Most studies requiring liquid cloud base height (LCBH) information use either fixed lidar parameter (depolarization and/or backscatter cross section) thresholds or cloud base height data products that do not distinguish between ice and liquid, all of which might introduce inconsistencies and errors in the resolved LCBH. In this paper, two explicit LCBH detection algorithms are presented. The first algorithm uses the high spectral resolution lidar (HSRL) data. Examination of this algorithm in multiple cases and scenarios during numerous days and first-order comparison with microwave-radiometer data show satisfactory results. The second algorithm incorporates widely available micropulse lidar (MPL) data for the LCBH detection. A 1-year long comparison of data gathered at Barrow, Alaska, and McMurdo Station, Antarctica, which includes other cloud base detection methodologies (ceilometer, MPL value-added product cloud base height, and LCBHs detected using a fixed MPL depolarization threshold), emphasizes the merits of the presented MPL algorithm. Examination of several unusual LCBH configurations suggests that the current practice of operating lidar at a tilting angle of 4° off zenith may not be sufficient to avoid specular reflection from oriented ice crystals. Data collected at Madison Wisconsin are used to show that specular reflection may impact measurements even at 4°.
AB - Liquid layers in clouds affect their microphysical processes, as well as the surface energy budget. Studies focusing on these and other areas of research are often in need of skillful estimation of liquid-bearing cloud layer boundaries. The bases of these layers are predominantly determined by ground-based lidar instruments. Most studies requiring liquid cloud base height (LCBH) information use either fixed lidar parameter (depolarization and/or backscatter cross section) thresholds or cloud base height data products that do not distinguish between ice and liquid, all of which might introduce inconsistencies and errors in the resolved LCBH. In this paper, two explicit LCBH detection algorithms are presented. The first algorithm uses the high spectral resolution lidar (HSRL) data. Examination of this algorithm in multiple cases and scenarios during numerous days and first-order comparison with microwave-radiometer data show satisfactory results. The second algorithm incorporates widely available micropulse lidar (MPL) data for the LCBH detection. A 1-year long comparison of data gathered at Barrow, Alaska, and McMurdo Station, Antarctica, which includes other cloud base detection methodologies (ceilometer, MPL value-added product cloud base height, and LCBHs detected using a fixed MPL depolarization threshold), emphasizes the merits of the presented MPL algorithm. Examination of several unusual LCBH configurations suggests that the current practice of operating lidar at a tilting angle of 4° off zenith may not be sufficient to avoid specular reflection from oriented ice crystals. Data collected at Madison Wisconsin are used to show that specular reflection may impact measurements even at 4°.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046149130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046149130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2017JD027840
DO - 10.1029/2017JD027840
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046149130
SN - 2169-897X
VL - 123
SP - 4310
EP - 4322
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
IS - 8
ER -