TY - JOUR
T1 - Population structure and dispersal of wolves in the Canadian Rocky Mountains
AU - Cullingham, Catherine I.
AU - Thiessen, Conrad D.
AU - Derocher, Andrew E.
AU - Paquet, Paul C.
AU - Miller, Joshua M.
AU - Hamilton, Jill A.
AU - Coltman, David W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was provided by Parks Canada, the Alberta Sport, Parks, Recreation, and Wildlife Trust Fund, the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program, the Alberta Cooperative Conservation Research Unit, a Yellowstone to Yukon Science Grant, and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant (AED). Fieldwork was conducted by N. DeBruyn, D. Garrow, and R. Rothgeb. DNA samples were provided by M. Hebblewhite, N. Webb, C. Bergman, S. Stotyn, L. Neufeld, C. Black (Northern Lights Wildlife Center), Banff National Park, Jasper National Park, East Kootenay Trappers Association, and Alberta Trappers Association. Laboratory assistance and guidance was provided by C. Davis, J. Pollinger, G. Wilson, and L. Carmichael. Comments were provided by 2 anonymous reviewers, J. Haines, A. Hamman, E. Merrill, S. Nakada, E. Neilson, B. Vonholdt, C. White, and G. Wilson on early versions of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Society of Mammalogists.
PY - 2016/6/9
Y1 - 2016/6/9
N2 - In the Canadian Rocky Mountains, the gray wolf (Canis lupus) has experienced range contractions and expansions, which can greatly affect pack stability as well as population structure. In addition, this area has a highly heterogeneous landscape that may form barriers to dispersal. To understand factors affecting pack structure and large-scale gene flow across the Rocky Mountains, we examined wolf genetic structure using 1,981 noninvasive and invasively collected samples. We sampled over 44 packs in Alberta and British Columbia and, from these, identified 540 individuals based on 12 microsatellites. Relatedness of individuals within packs was greater than between packs, and female relatedness was greater than males suggesting strong pack structure and female philopatry. Relatedness within packs was greater near major roads suggesting decreased dispersal from natal packs with proximity to roads. Across the study area, 2 significantly differentiated genetic clusters were identified, corresponding to a north/south split. Landcover distance was a significant correlate for 2 of 4 genetic distance measures, where packs in the north were in areas of dense coniferous forest, while packs in the south were primarily in open coniferous forest. These landcover differences suggest natal associations or could relate to prey distribution. Fine-scale investigation of pack dynamics across this continuous distribution, together with large-scale estimators of population structure, highlights different drivers of gene flow at the pack and population level.
AB - In the Canadian Rocky Mountains, the gray wolf (Canis lupus) has experienced range contractions and expansions, which can greatly affect pack stability as well as population structure. In addition, this area has a highly heterogeneous landscape that may form barriers to dispersal. To understand factors affecting pack structure and large-scale gene flow across the Rocky Mountains, we examined wolf genetic structure using 1,981 noninvasive and invasively collected samples. We sampled over 44 packs in Alberta and British Columbia and, from these, identified 540 individuals based on 12 microsatellites. Relatedness of individuals within packs was greater than between packs, and female relatedness was greater than males suggesting strong pack structure and female philopatry. Relatedness within packs was greater near major roads suggesting decreased dispersal from natal packs with proximity to roads. Across the study area, 2 significantly differentiated genetic clusters were identified, corresponding to a north/south split. Landcover distance was a significant correlate for 2 of 4 genetic distance measures, where packs in the north were in areas of dense coniferous forest, while packs in the south were primarily in open coniferous forest. These landcover differences suggest natal associations or could relate to prey distribution. Fine-scale investigation of pack dynamics across this continuous distribution, together with large-scale estimators of population structure, highlights different drivers of gene flow at the pack and population level.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983372492&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983372492&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jmammal/gyw015
DO - 10.1093/jmammal/gyw015
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84983372492
SN - 0022-2372
VL - 97
SP - 839
EP - 851
JO - Journal of Mammalogy
JF - Journal of Mammalogy
IS - 3
ER -