TY - JOUR
T1 - Population Turnover in Remote Oceania Shortly after Initial Settlement
AU - Lipson, Mark
AU - Skoglund, Pontus
AU - Spriggs, Matthew
AU - Valentin, Frederique
AU - Bedford, Stuart
AU - Shing, Richard
AU - Buckley, Hallie
AU - Phillip, Iarawai
AU - Ward, Graeme K.
AU - Mallick, Swapan
AU - Rohland, Nadin
AU - Broomandkhoshbacht, Nasreen
AU - Cheronet, Olivia
AU - Ferry, Matthew
AU - Harper, Thomas K.
AU - Michel, Megan
AU - Oppenheimer, Jonas
AU - Sirak, Kendra
AU - Stewardson, Kristin
AU - Auckland, Kathryn
AU - Hill, Adrian V.S.
AU - Maitland, Kathryn
AU - Oppenheimer, Stephen J.
AU - Parks, Tom
AU - Robson, Kathryn
AU - Williams, Thomas N.
AU - Kennett, Douglas J.
AU - Mentzer, Alexander J.
AU - Pinhasi, Ron
AU - Reich, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/4/2
Y1 - 2018/4/2
N2 - Ancient DNA from Vanuatu and Tonga dating to about 2,900–2,600 years ago (before present, BP) has revealed that the “First Remote Oceanians” associated with the Lapita archaeological culture were directly descended from the population that, beginning around 5000 BP, spread Austronesian languages from Taiwan to the Philippines, western Melanesia, and eventually Remote Oceania. Thus, ancestors of the First Remote Oceanians must have passed by the Papuan-ancestry populations they encountered in New Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago, and the Solomon Islands with minimal admixture [1]. However, all present-day populations in Near and Remote Oceania harbor >25% Papuan ancestry, implying that additional eastward migration must have occurred. We generated genome-wide data for 14 ancient individuals from Efate and Epi Islands in Vanuatu from 2900–150 BP, as well as 185 present-day individuals from 18 islands. We find that people of almost entirely Papuan ancestry arrived in Vanuatu by around 2300 BP, most likely reflecting migrations a few hundred years earlier at the end of the Lapita period, when there is also evidence of changes in skeletal morphology and cessation of long-distance trade between Near and Remote Oceania [2, 3]. Papuan ancestry was subsequently diluted through admixture but remains at least 80%–90% in most islands. Through a fine-grained analysis of ancestry profiles, we show that the Papuan ancestry in Vanuatu derives from the Bismarck Archipelago rather than the geographically closer Solomon Islands. However, the Papuan ancestry in Polynesia—the most remote Pacific islands—derives from different sources, documenting a third stream of migration from Near to Remote Oceania. Lipson, Skoglund, et al. analyze ancient DNA from the Pacific island chain of Vanuatu over its entire span of occupation. After humans first arrived around 3,000 years ago, there was a nearly complete replacement of the original inhabitants by 2,300 years ago, and this second wave forms the primary ancestry of people in Vanuatu today.
AB - Ancient DNA from Vanuatu and Tonga dating to about 2,900–2,600 years ago (before present, BP) has revealed that the “First Remote Oceanians” associated with the Lapita archaeological culture were directly descended from the population that, beginning around 5000 BP, spread Austronesian languages from Taiwan to the Philippines, western Melanesia, and eventually Remote Oceania. Thus, ancestors of the First Remote Oceanians must have passed by the Papuan-ancestry populations they encountered in New Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago, and the Solomon Islands with minimal admixture [1]. However, all present-day populations in Near and Remote Oceania harbor >25% Papuan ancestry, implying that additional eastward migration must have occurred. We generated genome-wide data for 14 ancient individuals from Efate and Epi Islands in Vanuatu from 2900–150 BP, as well as 185 present-day individuals from 18 islands. We find that people of almost entirely Papuan ancestry arrived in Vanuatu by around 2300 BP, most likely reflecting migrations a few hundred years earlier at the end of the Lapita period, when there is also evidence of changes in skeletal morphology and cessation of long-distance trade between Near and Remote Oceania [2, 3]. Papuan ancestry was subsequently diluted through admixture but remains at least 80%–90% in most islands. Through a fine-grained analysis of ancestry profiles, we show that the Papuan ancestry in Vanuatu derives from the Bismarck Archipelago rather than the geographically closer Solomon Islands. However, the Papuan ancestry in Polynesia—the most remote Pacific islands—derives from different sources, documenting a third stream of migration from Near to Remote Oceania. Lipson, Skoglund, et al. analyze ancient DNA from the Pacific island chain of Vanuatu over its entire span of occupation. After humans first arrived around 3,000 years ago, there was a nearly complete replacement of the original inhabitants by 2,300 years ago, and this second wave forms the primary ancestry of people in Vanuatu today.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042673935&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042673935&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.051
DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.051
M3 - Article
C2 - 29501328
AN - SCOPUS:85042673935
SN - 0960-9822
VL - 28
SP - 1157-1165.e7
JO - Current Biology
JF - Current Biology
IS - 7
ER -