TY - JOUR
T1 - Portuguese older adults presenting at the emergency department
T2 - Predictive validity of the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) tool
AU - Tavares, João Paulo de Almeida
AU - Sa-Couto, Pedro
AU - Boltz, Marie P.
AU - Capezuti, Elizabeth
PY - 2017/8/1
Y1 - 2017/8/1
N2 - Following an emergency department (ED) visit, older adults are more likely to experience poorer outcomes than younger adults. It is crucial to identify older patients using a validated tool. One of the most studied tools is the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR), which is used to identify older adults at risk of adverse outcomes after ED admission. The purpose of the current study was to examine the sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability of the Portuguese version of the ISAR when considering early (30 days) and late (180 days) outcomes. Four hundred two older adults presenting in EDs from January 2013 to August 2014 were prospectively enrolled and surveyed. The ISAR threshold (cutoff ≥2) presented a better compromise between sensitivity (81.8% to 88.7%) and specificity (14.7% to 28.1%) when compared to cutoffs ≥1 or ≥3, respectively. Interrater reliability results were very good (0.81 to 0.94). Overall, the Portuguese ISAR appears worthwhile for screening older adults at risk in EDs.
AB - Following an emergency department (ED) visit, older adults are more likely to experience poorer outcomes than younger adults. It is crucial to identify older patients using a validated tool. One of the most studied tools is the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR), which is used to identify older adults at risk of adverse outcomes after ED admission. The purpose of the current study was to examine the sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability of the Portuguese version of the ISAR when considering early (30 days) and late (180 days) outcomes. Four hundred two older adults presenting in EDs from January 2013 to August 2014 were prospectively enrolled and surveyed. The ISAR threshold (cutoff ≥2) presented a better compromise between sensitivity (81.8% to 88.7%) and specificity (14.7% to 28.1%) when compared to cutoffs ≥1 or ≥3, respectively. Interrater reliability results were very good (0.81 to 0.94). Overall, the Portuguese ISAR appears worthwhile for screening older adults at risk in EDs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026788278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026788278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3928/00989134-20170405-02
DO - 10.3928/00989134-20170405-02
M3 - Article
C2 - 28399314
AN - SCOPUS:85026788278
SN - 0098-9134
VL - 43
SP - 18
EP - 24
JO - Journal of gerontological nursing
JF - Journal of gerontological nursing
IS - 8
ER -