TY - JOUR
T1 - Positivity and well-being among community-residing elders and nursing home residents
T2 - What is the optimal affect balance?
AU - Meeks, Suzanne
AU - Van Haitsma, Kimberly
AU - Kostiwa, Irene
AU - Murrell, Stanley A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The data collection for Sample 1 was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH33063 .
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - Objectives: To explore whether a ratio of positive to negative affect, from the work of Fredricksen and Losada, could predict high levels of well-being in elderly samples and especially in nursing home residents despite multiple chronic health conditions, consonant with Ryff and Singer's notion of "flourishing under fire." Method: We used two samples: a probability sample of community-residing elders and a sample from nursing homes. We calculated ratios of positive to negative affect in each sample and measured well-being with social interaction, mental health, life satisfaction, and general well-being. Results: The positivity ratio of 2.9 differentiated high levels of well-being in both the samples, as in previous research on younger samples. Discussion: Although we expected the positivity ratio to perform less well among nursing home residents, we found that it differentiated residents with high well-being just as well as in the community sample. The ability to regulate positive affect to maintain a relative ratio of positive over negative affect appears to be an important aspect of successful adjustment in late life. Further research is needed on objective indicators of quality of life and on whether intra-individual shifts in affect balance are coupled with shifts in indicators of positive mental health.
AB - Objectives: To explore whether a ratio of positive to negative affect, from the work of Fredricksen and Losada, could predict high levels of well-being in elderly samples and especially in nursing home residents despite multiple chronic health conditions, consonant with Ryff and Singer's notion of "flourishing under fire." Method: We used two samples: a probability sample of community-residing elders and a sample from nursing homes. We calculated ratios of positive to negative affect in each sample and measured well-being with social interaction, mental health, life satisfaction, and general well-being. Results: The positivity ratio of 2.9 differentiated high levels of well-being in both the samples, as in previous research on younger samples. Discussion: Although we expected the positivity ratio to perform less well among nursing home residents, we found that it differentiated residents with high well-being just as well as in the community sample. The ability to regulate positive affect to maintain a relative ratio of positive over negative affect appears to be an important aspect of successful adjustment in late life. Further research is needed on objective indicators of quality of life and on whether intra-individual shifts in affect balance are coupled with shifts in indicators of positive mental health.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863335131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863335131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/geronb/gbr135
DO - 10.1093/geronb/gbr135
M3 - Article
C2 - 22227736
AN - SCOPUS:84863335131
SN - 1079-5014
VL - 67 B
SP - 460
EP - 467
JO - Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
JF - Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
IS - 4
ER -