Abstract
BACKGROUNDDermatologic surgery is associated with low postoperative infection rates, averaging from approximately 1% to 4.25%. Often, postoperative infections are treated empirically based on clinical diagnosis of infection, given it can take 48 to 72 hours for a wound culture to identify a pathogen.OBJECTIVEWe aimed to evaluate the efficacy of empiric antibiotics in dermatologic surgery postoperative infections and if wound cultures change postoperative antibiotic therapy.METHODSA 7-center, retrospective analysis of postoperative infections, with culture data, in dermatologic surgery patients was performed.RESULTSOf 91 cases of clinically diagnosed postoperative infection, 82.4% (n = 75) were successfully treated with empiric oral antibiotics (95% confidence interval [0.73-0.89], p <.0001). In 16 (17.6%) cases, initial empiric antibiotics were unsuccessful, and wound culture results altered antibiotic therapy in 9 cases (9.9%) with 6 (6.6%) of these cases requiring additional coverage for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).CONCLUSIONEmpiric antibiotic treatment is usually appropriate for patients with postoperative surgical-site infections with wound cultures altering antibiotic management in a minority of cases. When empiric antibiotics fail, lack of MRSA coverage is usually the cause; therefore, providers should be aware of local MRSA prevalence and susceptibilities.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1294-1299 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Dermatologic Surgery |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1 2020 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Surgery
- Dermatology