TY - JOUR
T1 - Postoperative Radiotherapy 6 Cetuximab for Intermediate-Risk Head and Neck Cancer
AU - NRG Oncology RTOG 0920 Collaborating Team
AU - Machtay, Mitchell
AU - Torres-Saavedra, Pedro A.
AU - Thorstad, Wade
AU - Nguyen-Tân, Phuc Felix
AU - Siu, Lillian L.
AU - Holsinger, F. Christopher
AU - El-Naggar, Adel
AU - Chung, Christine
AU - Cmelak, Anthony
AU - Burtness, Barbara
AU - Bednarz, Greg
AU - Quon, Harry
AU - Breen, Stephen L.
AU - Gwede, Clement K.
AU - Dicker, Adam P.
AU - Yao, Min
AU - Jordan, Richard C.
AU - Dorth, Jennifer
AU - Lee, Nancy
AU - Chan, Jason W.
AU - Dunlap, Neal
AU - Bar-Ad, Voichita
AU - Stokes, William A.
AU - Chakravarti, Arnab
AU - Sher, David
AU - Rao, Shyam
AU - Harris, Jonathan
AU - Yom, Sue S.
AU - Le, Quynh Thu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - PURPOSE Radiotherapy (RT)/cetuximab (C) demonstrated superiority over RT alone for locally advanced squamous head and neck cancer. We tested this in completely resected, intermediate-risk cancer. METHODS Patients had squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or larynx, with one or more risk factors warranting postoperative RT. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to intensity-modulated RT (60-66 Gy) with once-per-week C or RT alone. The primary hypothesis was that RT 1 C would improve overall survival (OS) in randomly assigned/eligible patients, with a prespecified secondary plan to test this in the human papillomavirus (HPV)–negative subpopulation. Disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity were secondary end points. OS and DFS were tested via stratified log-rank test; toxicity was compared via Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS We enrolled 702 patients from November 2009 to March 2018; 577 were randomly assigned/eligible. Most (63.6%) had oral cavity cancer and most (84.6%) had high epidermal growth factor receptor expression. There were fewer deaths (184) than expected. OS (median follow up, 7.2 years) was not significantly improved (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; one-sided P 5 .0747; 5-year OS 76.5% v 68.7%), but DFS was (HR, 0.75; one-sided P 5 .0168; 5-year DFS 71.7% v 63.6%). Benefit of RT 1 C was only seen in the HPV-negative subpopulation (80.2% of patients in the trial). Grade 3-4 acute toxicity rates were 70.3% (RT 1 C) versus 39.7% (RT; two-sided P < .0001), mostly skin and/or mucosal effects. Late grade ≥3 toxicity rate was 33.2% (RT 1 C) versus 29.0% (RT; two-sided P 5 .3101). There were no grade 5 toxicities in either arm. CONCLUSION RT 1 C significantly improved DFS, but not OS, with no increase in long-term toxicity, compared with RT alone for resected, intermediate-risk SCCHN. RT 1 C is an appropriate option for carefully selected patients with HPV-negative disease.
AB - PURPOSE Radiotherapy (RT)/cetuximab (C) demonstrated superiority over RT alone for locally advanced squamous head and neck cancer. We tested this in completely resected, intermediate-risk cancer. METHODS Patients had squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or larynx, with one or more risk factors warranting postoperative RT. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to intensity-modulated RT (60-66 Gy) with once-per-week C or RT alone. The primary hypothesis was that RT 1 C would improve overall survival (OS) in randomly assigned/eligible patients, with a prespecified secondary plan to test this in the human papillomavirus (HPV)–negative subpopulation. Disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity were secondary end points. OS and DFS were tested via stratified log-rank test; toxicity was compared via Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS We enrolled 702 patients from November 2009 to March 2018; 577 were randomly assigned/eligible. Most (63.6%) had oral cavity cancer and most (84.6%) had high epidermal growth factor receptor expression. There were fewer deaths (184) than expected. OS (median follow up, 7.2 years) was not significantly improved (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; one-sided P 5 .0747; 5-year OS 76.5% v 68.7%), but DFS was (HR, 0.75; one-sided P 5 .0168; 5-year DFS 71.7% v 63.6%). Benefit of RT 1 C was only seen in the HPV-negative subpopulation (80.2% of patients in the trial). Grade 3-4 acute toxicity rates were 70.3% (RT 1 C) versus 39.7% (RT; two-sided P < .0001), mostly skin and/or mucosal effects. Late grade ≥3 toxicity rate was 33.2% (RT 1 C) versus 29.0% (RT; two-sided P 5 .3101). There were no grade 5 toxicities in either arm. CONCLUSION RT 1 C significantly improved DFS, but not OS, with no increase in long-term toxicity, compared with RT alone for resected, intermediate-risk SCCHN. RT 1 C is an appropriate option for carefully selected patients with HPV-negative disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217003387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85217003387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO-24-01829
DO - 10.1200/JCO-24-01829
M3 - Article
C2 - 39841939
AN - SCOPUS:85217003387
SN - 0732-183X
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
M1 - JCO-24-01829
ER -