Abstract
In this essay I explore competing senses and tensions of the relation between the etymology of ta pragmata (things) and praxis (doing), with specific attention paid to Heidegger’s theorization of modernity. In so doing I question the relation between rights and persons, and whether there might not be a new way of thinking about rights that does not presuppose or privilege the agency of personhood. Pragmatic rights would not assume the liberal values of self-determination that underpin personhood, and would enable a notion of rights beyond liberal humanism more appropriate for twenty-first century political concerns and problems.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 155-171 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Law and Critique |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 17 2015 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pragmatic Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver