Abstract
Despite the vast coalition literature, pre-electoral coalitions have never been at the center of any systematic, cross-national research. Given their prevalence and potential impact on government composition and policies, this represents a serious omission in our knowledge of coalitions. I begin to remedy this situation by testing two hypotheses found in the literature on party coalitions. The first is that pre-electoral coalitions are more likely to form in disproportional systems if there are a sufficiently large number of parties. The second is that pre-electoral coalitions are more likely to form if voters face high uncertainty about the identity of future governments. These hypotheses are tested using a new dataset comprising legislative elections in 22 advanced industrialized countries between 1946 and 1998. The results of the statistical analysis support the first hypothesis, but not the second.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 643-663 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Electoral Studies |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2005 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Political Science and International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pre-electoral coalitions in comparative perspective: A test of existing hypotheses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver