TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicted mechanical properties of a coiled carbon nanotube
AU - Wang, Jinhe
AU - Kemper, Travis
AU - Liang, Tao
AU - Sinnott, Susan B.
N1 - Funding Information:
JW acknowledges the financial support provided by Shanghai Postdoctoral Science Foundation (11R21420900), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 11ZR1432100) and the China Scholarship Council through the scholarship program in 2008, while TK, TL, and SBS acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation (grant number CHE-0809376). We thank Vitor Coluci for providing the coiled nanotube unit cells used in these simulations and for helpful discussions.
PY - 2012/3
Y1 - 2012/3
N2 - Nanostructured carbon materials continue to attract much interest for use in devices and as fillers in composites. Here, classical molecular dynamics simulations are carried out using many-body empirical potentials to contrast the mechanical properties of straight and coiled carbon nanotubes. The specific properties of a coiled carbon nanotube (CCNT) are investigated under compression, tension, re-compression, re-tension and pullout from a polyethylene (PE) matrix. The stress-strain curves, spring constants, and yielding strains under compression and tension are given for each system, and the corresponding reasons for the differences in their behavior are discussed. They indicate that the interaction between a CCNT and a PE matrix is stronger than the corresponding interactions between CNTs and PE. Thus, the results indicate that CCNTs are good potential candidates for lightweight, tough composites.
AB - Nanostructured carbon materials continue to attract much interest for use in devices and as fillers in composites. Here, classical molecular dynamics simulations are carried out using many-body empirical potentials to contrast the mechanical properties of straight and coiled carbon nanotubes. The specific properties of a coiled carbon nanotube (CCNT) are investigated under compression, tension, re-compression, re-tension and pullout from a polyethylene (PE) matrix. The stress-strain curves, spring constants, and yielding strains under compression and tension are given for each system, and the corresponding reasons for the differences in their behavior are discussed. They indicate that the interaction between a CCNT and a PE matrix is stronger than the corresponding interactions between CNTs and PE. Thus, the results indicate that CCNTs are good potential candidates for lightweight, tough composites.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84155164028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84155164028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.060
DO - 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.060
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84155164028
SN - 0008-6223
VL - 50
SP - 968
EP - 976
JO - Carbon
JF - Carbon
IS - 3
ER -